NURS 5051 – Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology (Course Project Overview)

Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through TechnologyTransforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology

NURS 5051 – Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology Course (5 credits)

  • TN001 What is Informatics?
    • Analyze frameworks and tools for the role of the nurse as an informaticist and knowledge worker.
  • TN002 The Role of Nurse Informatics in Healthcare
    • Analyze the role of the nurse informaticist in nursing informatics projects to improve outcomes or efficiencies in healthcare organizations.
  • TN003 Data to Information to Knowledge to Wisdom
    • Analyze how standardized terminologies impact the practice of healthcare and nursing informatics.
  • TN004 Technologies Supporting Applied Practice and Optimal Patient Outcomes
    • Analyze nursing informatics research on the application of clinical systems to improve outcomes and efficiencies.
  • TN005 The Nurse Leader and the Systems Development Life Cycle
    • Define the role of the nurse for participation on an implementation team as a component of the systems development life cycle.
  • TN006 Policy and Regulation Supporting Informatics and Technology
    • Evaluate legislative policies and regulations for health and nursing informatics and their impact on improvement for outcomes and efficiencies in nursing practice.

Check Other Related Course Project Overview for the Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) at Walden University:

NURS 5050 – Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

 

Module 1: What Is Informatics? (Weeks 1-2)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). What is Informatics? [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze how data collection and access can be used to derive knowledge in a healthcare setting
  • Analyze the role of the nurse leader in using clinical reasoning and judgement in the formation of knowledge
  • Explain the role of the nurse as a knowledge worker
  • Explain concepts of nursing informatics
  • Create infographics related to nursing informatics and the role of the nurse as a knowledge worker

 

Due By Assignment
Week 1, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 1, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 1, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 1, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 1, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Week 2, Day 1–6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 2, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 1, “Nursing Science and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 7–19)
  • Chapter 2, “Introduction to Information, Information Science, and Information Systems” (pp. 21–33)
  • Chapter 3, “Computer Science and the Foundation of Knowledge Model” (pp. 35–62)

Nagle, L., Sermeus, W., & Junger, A. (2017).  Evolving Role of the Nursing Informatics Specialist. In J. Murphy, W. Goosen, &  P. Weber  (Eds.), Forecasting Competencies for Nurses in the Future of Connected Health (212-221). Clifton, VA: IMIA and IOS Press. Retrieved from https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_4A0FEA56B8CB.P001/REF

Sweeney, J. (2017). Healthcare informatics. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 21(1).

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health Informatics and Population Health: Trends in Population Health [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.

Public Health Informatics Institute. (2017). Public Health Informatics: “translating” knowledge for health [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLUygA8Hpfo

Discussion: The Application of Data to Problem-Solving

In the modern era, there are few professions that do not to some extent rely on data. Stockbrokers rely on market data to advise clients on financial matters. Meteorologists rely on weather data to forecast weather conditions, while realtors rely on data to advise on the purchase and sale of property. In these and other cases, data not only helps solve problems, but adds to the practitioner’s and the discipline’s body of knowledge.

Of course, the nursing profession also relies heavily on data. The field of nursing informatics aims to make sure nurses have access to the appropriate date to solve healthcare problems, make decisions in the interest of patients, and add to knowledge.

In this Discussion, you will consider a scenario that would benefit from access to data and how such access could facilitate both problem-solving and knowledge formation.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the concepts of informatics and knowledge work as presented in the Resources.
  • Consider a hypothetical scenario based on your own healthcare practice or organization that would require or benefit from the access/collection and application of data. Your scenario may involve a patient, staff, or management problem or gap.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a description of the focus of your scenario. Describe the data that could be used and how the data might be collected and accessed. What knowledge might be derived from that data? How would a nurse leader use clinical reasoning and judgment in the formation of knowledge from this experience?

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, asking questions to help clarify the scenario and application of data, or offering additional/alternative ideas for the application of nursing informatics principles.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 1 Discussion

Assignment: The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book, The Landmarks of Tomorrow (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.

In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.

Reference: Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

To Prepare:

  • Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.
  • Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
  • Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.

The Assignment:

  • Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
  • Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
  • Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.
  • Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your completed Presentation.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 2 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 2 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 2: The Role of the Informatics Specialist in Healthcare (Weeks 3-4)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Nurse Informaticist [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze interactions between nurse informaticists, data/technology specialists, and other professionals in healthcare organizations
  • Recommend strategies to improve interactions between nurse informaticists and other professionals
  • Analyze how nursing informatics as a specialty and new technologies impact interactions between nurse informaticists and members of healthcare teams
  • Recommend nursing informatics projects to improve outcomes or efficiencies in healthcare organizations
  • Identify stakeholders impacted by nursing informatics projects
  • Analyze how nursing informatics projects improve outcomes or efficiencies in healthcare organizations
  • Identify technologies required for implementation of nursing informatics projects
  • Analyze the role of the nurse informaticist in nursing informatics project teams

 

Due By Assignment
Week 3, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 3, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 3, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 3, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 3, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Deadline to submit your Assignment.
Week 4, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment
Week 4, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 525–535)
  • Chapter 26, “Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 537–551)

Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions: The Role of Executive Leadership. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration49(11), 543-548.

Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology Initiatives: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing36(5), 209-213.

Sipes, C. (2016). Project management: Essential skill of nurse informaticists. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.

Discussion: Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive.

Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the evolution of nursing informatics from a science to a nursing specialty.
  • Consider your experiences with nurse Informaticists or technology specialists within your healthcare organization.

By Day 3 of Week 3

Post a description of experiences or observations about how nurse informaticists and/or data or technology specialists interact with other professionals within your healthcare organization. Suggest at least one strategy on how these interactions might be improved. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain the impact you believe the continued evolution of nursing informatics as a specialty and/or the continued emergence of new technologies might have on professional interactions.

By Day 6 of Week 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, offering one or more additional interaction strategies in support of the examples/observations shared or by offering further insight to the thoughts shared about the future of these interactions.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 3 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 3 Discussion

Practicum Reminder

Practicum Reminder – Important

During your program, you will be required to submit your practicum application. You are responsible for applying on time and for the information that is outlined in the practicum manual. Applications are due the first day of the term before you intend to start practicum. For exact dates and for an overview of the requirements, please review our website.

It is important that you find a suitable preceptor. There is information in the Practicum manual and on our website about the requirements for preceptors. Each course has specific requirements and you are responsible for ensuring your preceptor meet the requirements. If you have questions about preceptor requirements, you may schedule a phone appointment by contacting Field Experience.

CONTACT US: https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/contactus

Assignment: The Impact of Nursing Informatics on Patient Outcomes and Patient Care Efficiencies

In the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined?

Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.

To Prepare:

  • Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.
  • Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:

  • Describe the project you propose.
  • Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
  • Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
  • Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
  • Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
  • Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

By Day 7 of Week 4

Submit your completed Project Proposal.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 4 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 3: Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) (Week 5)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze benefits, challenges, and risks of using big data in clinical systems
  • Recommend strategies to mitigate challenges and risks of using big data in clinical systems

 

Due By Assignment
Week 5, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 5, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Week 5, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Week 5, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 5, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 22, “Data Mining as a Research Tool” (pp. 477-493)
  • Chapter 24, “Bioinformatics, Biomedical Informatics, and Computational Biology” (pp. 537-551)

Glassman, K. S. (2017). Using data in nursing practice. American Nurse Today, 12(11), 45–47. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ant11-Data-1030.pdf

Thew, J. (2016, April 19). Big data means big potential, challenges for nurse execs. Retrieved from https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/big-data-means-big-potential-challenges-nurse-execs

Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(1), 3–13.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Executive Producer). (2012). Data, information, knowledge and wisdom continuum [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6051/03/mm/continuum/index.html

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health Informatics and Population Health: Analyzing Data for Clinical Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Vinay Shanthagiri. (2014). Big Data in Health Informatics [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W6zGmH_pOw

Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards

When you wake in the morning, you may reach for your cell phone to reply to a few text or email messages that you missed overnight. On your drive to work, you may stop to refuel your car. Upon your arrival, you might swipe a key card at the door to gain entrance to the facility. And before finally reaching your workstation, you may stop by the cafeteria to purchase a coffee.

From the moment you wake, you are in fact a data-generation machine. Each use of your phone, every transaction you make using a debit or credit card, even your entrance to your place of work, creates data. It begs the question: How much data do you generate each day? Many studies have been conducted on this, and the numbers are staggering: Estimates suggest that nearly 1 million bytes of data are generated every second for every person on earth.

As the volume of data increases, information professionals have looked for ways to use big data—large, complex sets of data that require specialized approaches to use effectively. Big data has the potential for significant rewards—and significant risks—to healthcare. In this Discussion, you will consider these risks and rewards.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the web article Big Data Means Big Potential, Challenges for Nurse Execs.
  • Reflect on your own experience with complex health information access and management and consider potential challenges and risks you may have experienced or observed.

By Day 3 of Week 5

Post a description of at least one potential benefit of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Then, describe at least one potential challenge or risk of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Propose at least one strategy you have experienced, observed, or researched that may effectively mitigate the challenges or risks of using big data you described. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 5

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering one or more additional mitigation strategies or further insight into your colleagues’ assessment of big data opportunities and risks.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 5 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 5 Discussion

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 4: Technologies Supporting Applied Practice and Optimal Patient Outcomes (Weeks 6-8)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Informatics Tools and Technologies [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate healthcare technology trends for data and information in nursing practice and healthcare delivery
  • Analyze challenges and risks inherent in healthcare technology
  • Analyze healthcare technology benefits and risks for data safety, legislation, and patient care
  • Evaluate healthcare technology impact on patient outcomes, efficiencies, and data management
  • Analyze research on the application of clinical systems to improve outcomes and efficiencies

 

Due By Assignment
Week 6, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 6, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 6, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Week 7, Days 1-7 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
  • Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
  • Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338)
  • Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355)
  • Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)

 Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449

HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Retrieved from

https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr

Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.

Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Public Health Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Electronic Records and Managing IT Change [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Discussion: Healthcare Information Technology Trends

Throughout history, technological advancements have appeared for one purpose before finding applications elsewhere that lead to spikes in its usage and development. The internet, for example, was originally developed to share research before becoming a staple of work and entertainment. But technology—new and repurposed—will undoubtedly continue to be a driver of healthcare information. Informaticists often stay tuned to trends to monitor what the next new technology will be or how the next new idea for applying existing technology can benefit outcomes.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your healthcare organization’s use of technology and offer a technology trend you observe in your environment.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the Resources related to digital information tools and technologies.
  • Consider your healthcare organization’s use of healthcare technologies to manage and distribute information.
  • Reflect on current and potential future trends, such as use of social media and mobile applications/telehealth, Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled asset tracking, or expert systems/artificial intelligence, and how they may impact nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

By Day 3 of Week 6

Post a brief description of general healthcare technology trends, particularly related to data/information you have observed in use in your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Describe any potential challenges or risks that may be inherent in the technologies associated with these trends you described. Then, describe at least one potential benefit and one potential risk associated with data safety, legislation, and patient care for the technologies you described. Next, explain which healthcare technology trends you believe are most promising for impacting healthcare technology in nursing practice and explain why. Describe whether this promise will contribute to improvements in patient care outcomes, efficiencies, or data management. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, offering additional/alternative ideas regarding opportunities and risks related to the observations shared.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 6 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 6

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 6 Discussion

Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  • Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
  • Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.
  • For information about annotated bibliographies, visit https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies

The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

  • Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
  • Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.
  • Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
  • In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
  • Use APA format and include a title page.
  • Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

By Day 7 of Week 8

Submit your completed Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 5

Module 5: The Nurse Leader and the System Development Life Cycle (Weeks 9-10)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Systems Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze how inclusion of the nurse in the purchasing of health information technology systems impacts healthcare organizations
  • Analyze the impact of nurse inclusion on each step of the systems development life cycle

 

Due By Assignment
Week 9, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 9, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 9, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Week 10, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 10, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 9, “Systems Development Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” (pp. 175–187)
  • Chapter 12, “Electronic Security” (pp. 229–242)
  • Chapter 13, “Workflow and Beyond Meaningful Use” (pp. 245–261)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.a). Health IT evaluation toolkit and evaluation measures quick reference guide. Retrieved January 26, 2022, from https://digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-evaluation-toolkit

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.b). Workflow assessment for health IT toolkit. Retrieved January 26, 2022, from https://digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit

Required Media

Louis, I. (2011, August 17). Systems development life cycle (SDLC) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtpyjPrpyX8

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Interoperability, Standards, and Security [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Managing Health Information Technology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle

In the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences.

In this Discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development.

To Prepare:

  • Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) as presented in the Resources.
  • Reflect on your own healthcare organization and consider any steps your healthcare organization goes through when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system.
  • Consider what a nurse might contribute to decisions made at each stage of the SDLC when planning for new health information technology.

By Day 3 of Week 9

Post a description of what you believe to be the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Provide specific examples of potential issues at each stage of the SDLC and explain how the inclusion of nurses may help address these issues. Then, explain whether you had any input in the selection and planning of new health information technology systems in your nursing practice or healthcare organization and explain potential impacts of being included or not in the decision-making process. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 9

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering additional thoughts regarding the examples shared, SDLC-related issues, and ideas on how the inclusion of nurses might have impacted the example described by your colleagues.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 9 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 9 Discussion

Portfolio Assignment: The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation

Assume you are a nurse manager on a unit where a new nursing documentation system is to be implemented. You want to ensure that the system will be usable and acceptable for the nurses impacted. You realize a nurse leader must be on the implementation team.

To Prepare:

  • Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and reflect on the scenario presented.
  • Consider the benefits and challenges associated with involving a nurse leader on an implementation team for health information technology.

The Assignment: (2-3 pages not including the title and reference page)

In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:

  • Planning and requirements definition
  • Analysis
  • Design of the new system
  • Implementation
  • Post-implementation support
  • Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
  • Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

By Day 7 of Week 10

Submit your completed Role Description.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 10 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 10 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 6

 

Module 6: Policy and Regulation Supporting Informatics and Technology Integration (Week 11)

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Policy and Regulation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate legislative policies and regulations for health and nursing informatics
  • Create fact sheets for health and nursing informatics
  • Analyze impact of legislative policies and regulations for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflows
  • Evaluate healthcare organizational policies and procedures to address legislative policies and regulations
Due By Assignment
Week 11, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 11, Days 3-4 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 11, Day 5 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Photo Credit: [Phil Roeder]/[Moment]/Getty Images

Learning Resources

Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 8, “Legislative Aspects of Nursing Informatics: HITECH and HIPAA” (pp. 145–166)

American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2018). MACRA/MIPS: The transition from fee-for-service to quality-based reimbursement. Retrieved from https://www.aanp.org/legislation-regulation/federal-legislation/macra-s-quality-payment-program

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (n.d.). MACRA. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/value-based-programs/macra-mips-and-apms/macra-mips-and-apms.html

HealthIT.gov. (2018a). Health IT legislation. Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/topic/laws-regulation-and-policy/health-it-legislation

HealthIT.gov. (2018b). Meaningful use and MACRA. Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/topic/meaningful-use-and-macra/meaningful-use-and-macra

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Laws & regulations. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://www.hhs.gov/regulations/index.html

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health Informatics & Population Health Analytics: Privacy, Security, and Ethics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

 

Assignment: Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet

As a professional nurse, you are expected to apply your expertise to patient care. On occasion, you will also be expected to share that expertise.

With evolving technology and continuous changes to regulations designed to keep up these changes, there is usually a need to share information and expertise to inform colleagues, leadership, patients, and other stakeholders.

In this Assignment, you will study a recent nursing informatics-related healthcare policy, and you will share the relevant details via a fact sheet designed to inform and educate.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources on healthcare policy and regulatory/legislative topics related to health and nursing informatics.
  • Consider the role of the nurse informaticist in relation to a healthcare organization’s compliance with various policies and regulations, such as the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA).
  • Research and select one health or nursing informatics policy (within the past 5 years) or regulation for further study.

The Assignment: (1 page)

Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following:

  • Briefly and generally explain the policy or regulation you selected.
  • Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on system implementation.
  • Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.
  • Highlight organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at your healthcare organization to address the policy or regulation you selected. Be specific.

By Day 5 of Week 11

Submit your completed Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 5 of Week 11

To submit your Assignment:

Week 11 Assignment

Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this Module, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at NursingCustomWriting.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

NURS 5050 – Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health (Course Project Overview)

Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population HealthPolicy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

NURS 5050 – Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health Course (5 credits)

  • PA001 Agenda Setting
    • Evaluate federal agendas to promote healthcare issues within the policymaking system/process.
  • PA002 Legislation
    • Advocate a position on a population health-related bill.
  • PA003 Regulation
    • Analyze how regulations influence the nurse’s role and the delivery, costs, and access to healthcare.
  • PA004 Design and Implementation
    • Analyze advocacy and the role of the nurse in healthcare program design and implementation.
  • PA005 Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
    • Assess outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations.
  • PA006 Global Healthcare Issues
    • Analyze the impact of nurse advocacy on addressing global health issues.

NURS 6050/5050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

Student Support and Calendar Information

So you have all key information available to you off-line, it is highly recommended that you print the following items for your reference:

  • This Syllabus, including the Course Schedule that is linked on this page as a PDF
  • Course Calendar
  • Support, Guidelines, and Policies

Photo Credit: Sam Edwards / Caiaimage / Getty Images

Credit Hours

  • 5 credits in 11 weeks

Walden University assigns credit hours based on the number and type of assignments that enable students to achieve the course learning objectives NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health. In general, each semester credit equals about 42 hours of total student work and each quarter credit equals about 28 hours of total student work. This time requirement represents an approximate average for undergraduate work and the minimum expectations for graduate work. The number and kind of activities estimated to fulfill time requirements will vary by degree level and student learning style, and by student familiarity with the delivery method and course content.

You Can Also Check Other Related Course Project Overview for the Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) at Walden University:

NURS 5051 – Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology

NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

Course Description

In today’s rapidly changing healthcare delivery system, decisions made within the political arena impact the future of health delivery systems, healthcare professionals, and the populations they serve. In this course, students examine the policy process and its impact on healthcare delivery, cost, quality, and access NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health. Students examine the importance of getting healthcare issues on federal and state agenda, investigate governmental response through legislation and regulation, and identify where they can advocate for positive outcomes in program/policy design, implementation, and evaluation. Global health issues are examined for their relevance and impact on the development of the nurse advocate. Through discussions, reflection, case studies, and the application of professional communications techniques as political tactics to influence policy outcomes, students demonstrate integration of policy decision-making into professional nurse practice for the benefit of individuals and populations NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Course Learning Outcomes

By the conclusion of this course, you should be able to:

  • Evaluate factors that affect nursing practice (such as socioeconomic, political, legal/regulatory, ethical, and global factors).
  • Evaluate factors that affect healthcare delivery systems (such as socioeconomic, political, legal/regulatory, ethical, and global factors).
  • Evaluate factors that affect population health (such as socioeconomic, political, legal/regulatory, ethical, and global factors).
  • Analyze the influence of policy and politics on the cost, quality, and access to healthcare delivery systems.
  • Apply policy processes including political advocacy skills into professional nursing practice.
  • Assess tradeoffs between cost, quality, and access inherent in a complex healthcare delivery system.
  • Analyze global policies for health and healthcare issues NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

College of Nursing Alignment of Learner Outcomes

Click on the following link to access the College of Nursing Alignment of Learner Outcomes:

Document: NURS 6050 College of Nursing Alignment of Learner Outcomes (PDF)

Course Materials

Please visit the university bookstore via your Walden student portal to ensure you are obtaining the correct version of any course texts and/or materials noted in the following section. When you receive your materials, make sure that all required items are included.

Course Text

Milstead, J.A., & Short, N.M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Note: If the print edition of these books are referenced here, electronic versions also may be available and may be acceptable for use in this course. If an electronic version is listed, no print version is available NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Other readings (journal articles, websites, book excerpts, etc.) are assigned throughout the course and may be found within each Module.

Note: The following text is required for use throughout your MSN program and should have been purchased in NURS 6002/NURS 6003:

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Media

Assigned course media elements may be found in one or more modules of the course and are available via a streaming media player or a hyperlink to the individual item.

Course Readings List

The Course Readings List contains all the required Walden Library resources for this course. Please click on the following link to access the list:

NURS 6050 Course Readings List

Primary and Secondary Sources

Review the following information prior to selecting resources for assignments.

Primary: A primary source is an original document that is the first account of what happened. A research report is primary, and you can tell because it includes materials and methods demonstrating how the research was done. Some creative work is also primary, such as poetry, novels, and interviews of people who experienced something firsthand. In nursing, which is an evidence-based discipline, we strive to use primary research that is published in scholarly, peer-reviewed journals.

Scholarly, peer-reviewed journal: Scholarly journals publish papers by professional authors and experts in the field using a peer-review process to review the work and assure quality before publishing. The focus of a scholarly journal is to provide accurate information for scholars and other researchers. The focus is on content rather than advertising, a direct contrast to popular media. Scholarly journals publish both primary and secondary papers, the former usually noted as original research and the latter as reviews and commentaries. Letters to the editor may also be published but should be recognized as opinion pieces NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Note: When selecting articles for course assignments, you are advised (unless you are referencing seminal information) to focus on work published within the past five years.

Secondary: A secondary source is one step removed from the original source. This work interprets and often compiles other work, and it includes review articles, textbooks, fact sheets, and commentaries about a topic. It also includes news reports of original research. Secondary work is more prone to error and bias than primary work because it is being filtered through an additional person or persons. Review papers can be useful to glean information about a topic and to find other sources from the reference list, but it is the original, primary research that should be relied on most heavily in demonstrating scholarship, depth, and validation of factual information.

Course Assignments

    1. Participation in weekly Discussions: The exchange of ideas among colleagues engaged in scholarly inquiry is a key aspect of learning and is a requisite activity in this course. You are expected to participate each week by posting a response to a prompt or question in the weekly Discussion area. In addition, you are expected to respond to your fellow students’ postings. Within the course, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues. To count as participation, responses need to be thoughtful; that is, they must refer to the week’s readings, relevant issues in the news, information obtained from other sources, and/or ideas expressed in the postings of other class members. You may ask questions or offer further information or links about the subject NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health. Please pay attention to grammar and spelling, as consistently poorly written posts will receive grade penalties. In grading the required Discussion postings, your Instructor will be using the Discussion Posting and Response Rubric, located in the Course Information area.Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.
    1. Assignments: The Assignments provide you with the opportunity to apply the skills and knowledge gained through the Learning Resources and the practicum experience. See the Assignment area of specific weeks for detailed descriptions of the assignments. In grading the required Assignments, your Instructor will be using rubrics located in the Course Information area.

Note: The course Assignments will require that you completely and accurately demonstrate critical thinking via assimilation and synthesis of ideas when using credible, outside and course specific resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook), when comparing different points of view, highlighting similarities, differences, and connections, and/or when lending support to your Assignment responses NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

  1. Portfolio Assignment: Each course in the Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) program for the following specializations includes a Portfolio Assignment: Nursing Education, Nurse Executive, Nursing Informatics, and Public Health Nursing. The Portfolio Assignment is designed to measure specific professional knowledge and skills as outlined in the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Master’s Essentials. Students submit the Portfolio Assignment in the online classroom and a criterion-based scoring rubric is used to grade the assignment. The rubric is aligned with American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Master’s Essentials and provides specific and informative feedback on your performance. The Portfolio Assignment is evaluated by the course Instructor.

Grading Criteria and Total Components of a Grade

Course grades will be based on participation (postings) and completion of assignments listed below NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Letter grades will be assigned as follows:

90%–100% = A
80%–89% = B
70%–79% = C
< 70% = F

Please see below for the policy on Incomplete (I) grades.

 

Assignment Total Points Percentage
(Weighted)
Discussions
Participation in Discussions*
(6 @ 100 pts. each)
600 35%
Assignments
Module 1 Assignment (100 pts.)
Module 2 Assignment (100 pts.)
Module 3 Assignment (100 pts.)
Module 4 Assignment (100 pts.)
Module 5 Assignment (100 pts.)
Module 6 Assignment (100 pts.)**
600 65%
Total 1200 100%

 

* Each Discussion requires that you make one initial posting and at least two response postings to colleagues. See the Discussion Posting and Response Rubric for posting details.
**This is the Portfolio Assignment for this course NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Incomplete Grade Policy

Per University policy, Incomplete grades can be granted only to students who have already met the minimum criteria for active weekly participation in a course (including weekly postings in online courses) and have completed at least 80% of other coursework. Incompletes can be awarded when, because of extenuating circumstances, a student has not met additional course requirements, including but not limited to written assignments, group projects, and research papers, as applicable. All Incomplete grades are awarded at the discretion of the course faculty. (Reproduced from Student Catalog)

Students who are eligible for an Incomplete must contact the Course Faculty to request the grade as soon as possible. Students who do not meet the criteria listed above will not be allowed to earn an Incomplete. If the Incomplete is approved, the Faculty Member will work with the student to outline the due date(s) for remaining work. Under no circumstances will the new due dates extend beyond 50 days from the last day of the term. Faculty will then have 10 days to assess the work and post the permanent grade before the University-allotted Incomplete time limit of 60 days expires. All Incomplete grades not resolved within the time allotted will convert to permanent grades of F NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Instructor Feedback Schedule

The Instructor will log in to the course during the week to monitor the weekly Discussion area. Feedback will be provided via the My Grades area, the Discussion area, and/or the Announcements page.

Instructor feedback and explanation is provided whenever full credit is not achieved. Depending on the nature of the feedback, Instructor responses may be posted to the Discussion area or included in the My Grades area. The goal of your Instructor is to act as a discussion and learning facilitator rather than a lecturer. The Instructor will not respond to every posting by every individual, so please feel free to ask your Instructor if you would like some personal feedback on a particular assignment posting or any time you have any questions regarding your assignments or your grade.

For most assignments, you can expect your grades and/or feedback to be posted within five calendar days after the due date. Some assignments may require more than five days for your instructor to provide you with quality feedback NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Course Procedures

  • All class Discussions take place in the weekly Discussion areas.
  • You are encouraged to post course-related questions to the Contact the Instructor area as they may be of interest to all; however, if your question is urgent, it is often best to e-mail the Instructor. If your e-mailed question is thought to be of benefit to all, it may be responded to by the Instructor via e-mail to all or posted as an announcement.
  • Instructor feedback on content and writing issues that is thought to be of benefit to the entire class may be posted to the Contact the Instructor area; however, most personal critique will be done privately in the Grade Center. Be sure to check the Grade Center for comments every week even if you received full credit.
  • Please feel free to use the Class Café to initiate and participate in conversations not directly related to the course. This is an excellent opportunity to get to know other students better. The Instructor will browse the Class Café occasionally but generally will not respond to conversations posted there unless students have specific questions for him or her.
  • Check the e-mail account you use for official Walden University business on a regular basis. The expectation is that you are checking this e-mail account daily during the week. If you experience difficulty sending or receiving Walden e-mail, please contact the Student Support Team right away. Contact information for the Student Support Team is located in the Student Support area.
  • Review all materials in the Course Information area, as well as the materials contained under each of the weekly buttons.

Note: There are Optional Readings located within the Learning Resources section of each week in the course. You are encouraged to explore these readings, as needed, in order to enhance your understanding of the course content.

Preferred Methods for Delivering Assignments

  1. Be sure that you post to the correct Discussion area each week. Do not e-mail postings to the Instructor. For all initial Discussion postings, make sure that the first sentence of your posting reads Main Question Post. For your responses to others’ response postings, make sure that the first sentence of your response reads Response. These actions will ensure easily identifiable subject lines for your postings and responses.
  2. Application Assignments are submitted to the SafeAssign link and named according to the week in which the Assignment is submitted. Directions for naming each Application Assignment are included in each week’s Assignment area. Please be sure that all written Application Assignments are saved and submitted as a “.doc” file.
  3. All e-mail correspondence must contain in the subject line “NURS 6050-XX-NAME” (XX is the section number) followed by a brief description of the subject. This subject line convention ensures that your e-mail will be easily identified and responded to in a timely manner. It is required that the e-mail contain a signature that matches the official name used in the course.

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the due dates noted in the course. In extenuating circumstances, such as illness, the student must contact the Instructor as soon as possible to discuss the situation. In those circumstances, faculty will determine the appropriate course of action for the student. Depending on the situation, these actions may include recommendations to drop the course (if within the University drop/withdrawal period), acceptance of some or all of the overdue assignments with or without penalties, or failure to accept assignments.

Assignments submitted late without prior agreement of the Instructor, outside of an emergency absence, or in violation of agreements for late submission, will receive a grade reduction for the assignment amounting up to 20%. After 5 days, the assignment will not be graded. Students should be aware that late assignments may not receive the same level of written feedback as do assignments submitted on time NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Keeping Your Coursework

You will have access to the course and your coursework from the course start date until 60 days after the course ends. After this time, you will no longer be able to access the course or related materials. For this reason, we strongly recommend that you retain copies of your completed assignments and any documents you wish to keep. The University is not responsible for lost or missing coursework.

Course Evaluation

At or near the end of the course, you will receive an e-mail inviting you to submit an online evaluation of the course and instruction. All submitted course evaluations are confidential, and only aggregate data and comments will be shared with the Instructor and Program Director. Your feedback is vitally important to Walden University in its efforts to continuously improve programs.

Students With Disabilities

Students in this course who have a disability that might prevent them from fully demonstrating their abilities should contact the director of Student Wellness & Disability Services at disability@mail.waldenu.edu or at 1-800-925-3368, ext. 312-1205 and +1-612-925-3368 or https://www.waldenu.edu/contact-us for international toll-free numbers as soon as possible to initiate disability verification and discuss accommodations that may be necessary to ensure full participation in the successful completion of course requirements.

Classroom Participation

In accordance with U.S. Department of Education guidance regarding class participation, Walden University requires that all students submit at least one of their required Week 1 assignments (which includes posting to the Discussion Board) within each course(s) during the first 7 calendar days of class. For courses with two-week units, posting to the Discussion Board by Day 7 meets this requirement. The first calendar day of class is the official start date of the course as posted on your myWalden academic page.

Assignments submitted prior to the official start date will not count toward your participation. 

Financial Aid cannot be released without class participation as defined above. 

Students who are taking their first class with Walden and do not submit at least one of their required Week 1 assignments (or at least one Discussion post) by the end of the 7th day will be administratively withdrawn from the university NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Students who have already taken and successfully completed at least one or more class(es) with Walden, and who do not participate within the first 7 days, will be dropped from that class.

If you have any questions about your assignments, or you are unable to complete your assignments, please contact your Faculty Member.

 

The module course checklist below outlines the assignments due for the course.

 

For full assignment details and directions, refer to each module of the course. All assignments are due by 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT) on the day assigned (which is 1:59 a.m. Eastern Time (ET) the next day). The time stamp in the classroom will reflect Eastern Time (ET), regardless of your time zone. As long as your submission time stamp is no later than 1:59 a.m. Eastern Time (ET), you have submitted on time.

To View the Calendar

To view the Course Calendar:

Course Calendar

To View a Printable Course Schedule

For full assignment details and directions, refer to each Module of the course.

Click on the NURS 6050 Course Schedule (PDF) link to access the Course Schedule.

Document: NURS 6050 Course Schedule (PDF)

Checklist

 

Module Assignment Title
Weeks 1-2 (Module 1) Agenda Setting
Learning Resources Required Readings
Required Media
Discussion Presidential Agendas
Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheets/Talking Points Brief
Weeks 3-4 (Module 2) Legislation
Learning Resources Required Readings
Required Media
Discussion Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Assignment Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.
Weeks 5-6 (Module 3) Regulation
Learning Resources Required Readings
Required Media
Discussion Professional Nursing and State-level Regulations
Assignment Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development Meeting
Weeks 7-8 (Module 4) Healthcare Program Design and Implementation
Learning Resources Required Readings
Required Media
Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design
Discussion 2 The Role of the RN/APRN in Policymaking
Weeks 9-10 (Module 5) Program/Policy Evaluation
Learning Resources Required Readings
Required Media
Discussion The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation
Portfolio Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Week 11 (Module 6) Global Healthcare Issues
Learning Resources Required Readings
Required Media
Assignment Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement

 

Bibliography

The bibliography contains the references for all learning materials in the course. For your convenience, a link has been provided to download and save the bibliography NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

To access the Bibliography:

Document: NURS 6050 Bibliography (PDF)

Module 1: Agenda Setting (Weeks 1-2)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Meet the Experts: Pioneers in Policy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Policy Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Compare U.S. presidential agenda priorities
  • Evaluate ways that administrative agencies help address healthcare issues
  • Analyze how healthcare issues get on administrative agendas
  • Identify champions or sponsors of healthcare issues
  • Create fact sheets for communicating with policymakers or legislators
  • Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues

 

Due By Assignment
Week 1, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.
Week 1, Day 3 Post your initial discussion post.
Week 1, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 1, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Continue to compose your final draft of your Assignment.
Week 1, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Week 2, Day 1–6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 2, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 1, “Informing Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses” (pp. 11–13 only)
  • Chapter 2, “Agenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker’s Attention?” (pp. 17–36)
  • Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 171–180)
  • Chapter 12, “An Insider’s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities”
    • “Creating a Fact Sheet” (pp. 217-221)

DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2014.04.002

Kingdon, J.W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting with applications. Law Review M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331)

Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., … Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521–530. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2015.06.003.

O’Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135–148.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health.

USA.gov. (n.d.). A-Z index of U.S. government departments and agencies. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/a

USA.gov. (n.d.). Executive departments. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.usa.gov/executive-departments

The White House. (n.d.). The cabinet. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-trump-administration/the-cabinet/

Document: Agenda Comparison Grid Template (Word document)

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Setting the Agenda [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

 

Discussion: Presidential Agendas

Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.

Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.
  • Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 1 Discussion

Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

To Prepare:

  • Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.
  • Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.
  • Reflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.
  • Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

  • Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.
  • Describe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.
  • Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
  • Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.
  • At least 3 resources must be used

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

  • Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
  • How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?
  • Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?

Part 3: Narrative

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

  • Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
  • Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.
  • The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 2 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

To submit your Assignment:

Week 2 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 2

Module 2: Legislation (Weeks 3-4)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Legislation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze how cost-benefit analysis affects legislative efforts
  • Analyze legislative intent of bills
  • Identify proponents and opponents of bills
  • Analyze legislative process of bills
  • Advocate policy position for bills

 

Due By Assignment
Week 3, Days 1-2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 3, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 3, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 3, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 3, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Week 4, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 4, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 3, “Government Response: Legislation” (pp. 37–56)
  • Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 180–183 only)

Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

Taylor, D., Olshansky, E., Fugate-Woods, N., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017). Corrigendum to position statement: Political interference in sexual and reproductive health research and health professional education. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 346–350.

United States House of Representatives. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.house.gov/

United States Senate. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/

United States Senate. (n.d.). Senate organization chart for the 115th Congress. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/reference/org_chart.htm

Document: Legislation Grid Template (Word document) NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Working with Legislators [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Health Policy and Law with Joel Teitelbaum [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Contemporary Issues in Public Health Policy with Joel Teitelbaum [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Peter Beilenson: Population Health [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.

Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
  • Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.

By Day 3 of Week 3

Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.

By Day 6 of Week 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 3 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 3 Discussion

Assignment: Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement

As a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.

Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.

To Prepare:

  • Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)

Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.

Part 1: Legislation Grid

Based on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.
  • Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.
  • Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.
  • Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?

Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement

Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:

  • Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
  • Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
  • At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.

By Day 7 of Week 4

Submit your completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

To submit your Assignment:

Week 4 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 3

 

Module 3: Regulation (Weeks 5-6)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Regulation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Compare state/regional board of nursing regulations
  • Compare boards of nursing and professional nurse associations
  • Analyze members of boards of nursing
  • Analyze state regulations for healthcare NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

 

Due By Assignment
Week 5, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 5, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 5, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 5, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 5, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Week 6, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 4, “Government Response: Regulation” (pp. 57–84)

American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA enterprise. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://www.nursingworld.org

Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765.

Halm, M. A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified Fresno test for acute care nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(4), 272–280. doi:10.1111/wvn.12291

National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.ncsbn.org/index.htm

Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman J. S. (2018). The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to care. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 379–385. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.03.001

Peterson, C., Adams, S. A., & DeMuro, P. R. (2015). mHealth: Don’t forget all the stakeholders in the business case. Medicine 2.0, 4(2), e4 NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Regulatory Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Healthcare economics and financing [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Quality improvement and safety [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Discussion: Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations

Boards of Nursing (BONs) exist in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. Similar entities may also exist for different regions. The mission of BONs is the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice. BONs put into practice state/region regulations for nurses that, among other things, lay out the requirements for licensure and define the scope of nursing practice in that state/region.

It can be a valuable exercise to compare regulations among various state/regional boards of nursing. Doing so can help share insights that could be useful should there be future changes in a state/region. In addition, nurses may find the need to be licensed in multiple states or regions.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the mission of state/regional boards of nursing as the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice.
  • Consider how key regulations may impact nursing practice.
  • Review key regulations for nursing practice of your state’s/region’s board of nursing and those of at least one other state/region and select at least two APRN regulations to focus on for this Discussion..

By Day 3 of Week 5

Post a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.

By Day 6 of Week 5

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days and explain how the regulatory environment and the regulations selected by your colleague differ from your state/region. Be specific and provide examples.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 5 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 5 Discussion

Assignment: Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development Meeting

Nursing is a very highly regulated profession. There are over 100 boards of nursing and national nursing associations throughout the United States and its territories. Their existence helps regulate, inform, and promote the nursing profession. With such numbers, it can be difficult to distinguish between BONs and nursing associations, and overwhelming to consider various benefits and options offered by each.

Both boards of nursing and national nursing associations have significant impacts on the nurse practitioner profession and scope of practice. Understanding these differences helps lend credence to your expertise as a professional. In this Assignment, you will practice the application of such expertise by communicating a comparison of boards of nursing and professional nurse associations. You will also share an analysis of your state board of nursing.

To Prepare:

  • Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency.
  • Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation.

The Assignment: (8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation)

Develop a 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following:

  • Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.
  • Describe the board for your specific region/area.
    • Who is on the board?
    • How does one become a member of the board?
  • Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.
    • How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
    • How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
  • Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).
    • How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role?
    • How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?
  • Include Speaker Notes on Each Slide (except on the title page and reference page)

By Day 7 of Week 6

Submit your Regulation for Nursing Practice Staff Development Meeting Presentation NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 6 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 6 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
  • Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 6 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 6 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6

To submit your Assignment:

Week 6 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 4

Module 4: Healthcare Program Design and Implementation (Weeks 7-8)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Design and Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze health policies
  • Analyze opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in policy-making
  • Analyze strategies for overcoming challenges for participating in policy-making
  • Recommend strategies to improve the advocacy and communication of policy-making opportunities
  • Analyze healthcare programs
  • Analyze the role of the nurse in healthcare program design
  • Analyze the role of the nurse as advocates for target populations of healthcare programs
  • Analyze the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation
  • Analyze healthcare teams necessary for implementing healthcare programs

 

Due By Assignment
Week 7, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion 1 post.
Week 7, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion 1 post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 7, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion 1 posts.
Compose your peer Discussion 1 responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 7, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion 1 responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post) NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.
Week 7, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion 1.
Week 8, Days 1–2 Compose your initial Discussion 2 post.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion 2 post.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion 2 post.Compose your peer Discussion 2 post.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion 2 responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 8, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion 2.
Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 5, “Public Policy Design” (pp. 87–95 only)
  • Chapter 8, “The Impact of EHRs, Big Data, and Evidence-Informed Practice” (pp. 137–146)
  • Chapter 9, “Interprofessional Practice” (pp. 152–160 only)
  • Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 183–191 only)

American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). Advocacy. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (n.d.). Step by step: Evaluating violence and injury prevention policies: Brief 4: Evaluating policy implementation. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%204-a.pdf

Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.

Sacristán, J., & Dilla, T. D. (2015). No big data without small data: Learning health care systems begin and end with the individual patient. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1014–1017.

Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547 NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Getting your Program Designed and Implemented [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health policy and politics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
  • Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

By Day 3 of Week 7

Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 7

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 7 Discussion

Discussion 2: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making

Word cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events. Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their team or their role. A “word cloud” is generated by the application that makes prominent the most-used terms, offering an image of the common thinking among participants of that role.

What types of words would you use to build a nursing word cloud? Empathetic, organized, hard-working, or advocate would all certainly apply. Would you add policy-maker to your list? Do you think it would be a very prominent component of the word cloud?

Nursing has become one of the largest professions in the world, and as such, nurses have the potential to influence policy and politics on a global scale. When nurses influence the politics that improve the delivery of healthcare, they are ultimately advocating for their patients. Hence, policy-making has become an increasingly popular term among nurses as they recognize a moral and professional obligation to be engaged in healthcare legislation NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

To Prepare:

  • Revisit the Congress.gov website provided in the Resources and consider the role of RNs and APRNs in policy-making.
  • Reflect on potential opportunities that may exist for RNs and APRNs to participate in the policy-making process.

By Day 3 of Week 8

Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy-making. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities to participate in policy-making. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 8

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’* posts by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 8 Discussion

Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

As their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.

Much like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.
  • Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.
  • Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.

The Assignment: (2–4 pages)

In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:

  • Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?
  • Who is your target population?
  • What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?
  • What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
  • What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?
  • Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?

By Day 7 of Week 8

Submit your interview transcript.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8

To submit your Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 5

 

Module 5: Program/Policy Evaluation (Weeks 9-10)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Program Policy and Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in program/policy evaluations
  • Analyze strategies for overcoming challenges for participating in program/policy evaluations
  • Recommend strategies to improve the advocacy and communication of program/policy evaluations
  • Describe healthcare program/policy outcomes
  • Analyze healthcare program/policy evaluations
  • Analyze the role of the nurse advocate in program/policy evaluation

 

Due By Assignment
Week 9, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 9, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Days 4-5 Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Day 6 Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 9, Day 7 Wrap up Discussion.
Week 10, Days 1-6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 10, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only)

Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.

Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991.

Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393.

Document: Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Template (Word document)

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Importance of Program Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Peter Beilenson: Ethics and advocacy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters?

Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?

In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

To Prepare:

  • In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making.
  • Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.

By Day 3 of Week 9

Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 9

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 9 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 9 Discussion

Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
  • Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
  • Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
  • How was the success of the program or policy measured?
  • How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
  • How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
  • At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
  • What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
  • What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
  • What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
  • Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
  • Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
  • Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

By Day 7 of Week 10

Submit your completed healthcare program/policy evaluation analysis.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
  • Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 10 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

To submit your Assignment:

Week 10 Assignment

Module 5: Looking Ahead

Please Note: The Module 6, Week 11 Assignment, Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement, is due on Day 5 of Week 11.

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 6

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Science Photo Libra

Module 6: Global Healthcare Issues (Week 11)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Global Healthcare Issues [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Compare healthcare policies related to global healthcare issues in the U.S. and abroad
  • Analyze the impact of the social determinants of health on global healthcare issues
  • Analyze how policy impacts the health of the global population
  • Analyze how policy impacts the role of the nurse
  • Compare how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in the U.S and abroad
  • Recommend advocacy for the incorporation of a global perspective into local practice and the role of the nurse leader
  • Analyze impacts of the incorporation of a global perspective into local practice and the role of the nurse leader
  • Analyze how a global perspective represents and contributes to social change NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

 

Due By Assignment
Week 11, Days 1–2 Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Week 11, Day 3-4 Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 11, Day 5 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 11, “The Impact of Globalization: Nurses Influencing Global Health Policy” (pp. 194–208)

Corless, I. B., Nardi, D., Milstead, J. A., Larson, E., Nokes, K. M., Orsega, S., Kurth, A. E., … Woith, W. (2018). Expanding nursing’s role in responding to global pandemics. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 412–415.

Donkin, A., Goldblatt, P., Allen, J., Nathanson, V., & Marmot, M. (2017). Global action on the social determinants of health. BMJ Global Health, 3(1).

Sandoval-Almazana, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(Suppl. 1), S72–S81.

World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Global health agenda. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://www.who.int/about/vision/global_health_agenda/en/

Document: Global Health Comparison Matrix (Word document)

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Global Healthcare Issues [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Final Thoughts [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Assignment: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement

Note: This Assignment is due on Day 5 of Week 11.

If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?

You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.

Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country.

To Prepare:

  • Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.
  • Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.
  • Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.
  • Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)

Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix

Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:

  • Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.
  • Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.
  • Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.
  • Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.
  • Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 2: A Plan for Social Change

Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.

In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

  • Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
  • Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
  • Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples

By Day 5 of Week 11

Submit Part 1 and Part 2 of your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 5 of Week 11

To submit your Assignment:

Week 11 Assignment

Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this Module, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7 NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at NursingCustomWriting.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

NURS FPX 8030 Creation of Policy or Procedure Nursing Paper Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 5 Creation of Policy or ProcedureNURS FPX 8030 Assessment 5 Creation of Policy or Procedure

NURS FPX 8030 Creation of Policy or Procedure Nursing Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 5 Creation of Policy or Procedure

Understanding Assignment Objectives

In this assignment, you will be tasked with creating a new policy or procedure aimed at addressing a patient safety issue within a healthcare setting. The objective is to translate research findings into practical policies that can be implemented and sustained to promote patient safety and improve healthcare outcomes. This assignment is designed to assess your ability to apply evidence-based practices and leadership strategies in developing and implementing healthcare policies.

The Student’s Role

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role is to assume the position of the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence within a medical center. Your responsibility involves developing and implementing policies that reflect best practices and evidence-based interventions to address patient safety concerns. This role requires critical thinking, research skills, and the ability to formulate comprehensive policies that can be effectively implemented in healthcare settings.

Competencies Measured

This assignment will assess your proficiency in several key competencies:

  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP): Demonstrating the ability to translate research findings into practice by identifying and addressing patient safety issues.
  • Policy Development: Creating comprehensive policies that address specific healthcare challenges and promote patient safety.
  • Leadership Skills: Applying evidence-based leadership strategies to facilitate policy implementation and support organizational decision-making.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner Course:

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 1 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2 Evidenced Based Literature: Search and Organization Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 4 Methods and Measurement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Creation of Policy or Procedure Nursing Paper Example

Purpose

The extended stress experienced by nurses due to burnout can lead to emotional and physical exhaustion, posing significant challenges within the healthcare sector. Nursing burnout negatively impacts both nurses and patients, resulting in reduced job satisfaction, lower quality patient care, higher rates of medical errors, and increased turnover rates. Contributing factors to nursing burnout include excessive work hours, inadequate staffing, lack of support, and exposure to traumatic events.

It’s crucial to address untreated burnout promptly as it can diminish nurses’ effectiveness and contribute to errors, ultimately affecting patient care quality (Galischa & Sutrimo, 2022). Many studies highlight the necessity of a well-planned policy to combat burnout, proposing various interventions. Healthcare organizations must implement strategies aimed at preventing and managing nursing burnout to support nurses’ well-being and ensure high-quality patient care.

Revised PICO(T)

Among qualified hospital nurses (P), does the implementation of a stress-releasing program (I) compared to no intervention or stress management (C) reduce nursing burnout and increase job satisfaction (O) within a six-month timeframe (T)?

A proper healthcare plan based on credible and recent evidence is essential for designing a policy to intervene in nursing burnout and improve patient care outcomes. This plan addresses critical issues such as staffing, nursing leadership, and overall job satisfaction, emphasizing the importance of taking proactive measures to address this pressing issue.

Population Affected by the Policy

The target population for the intervention to address nursing burnout comprises registered nurses (RNs) employed in acute care hospital settings, particularly those working in high-stress areas like critical care units, emergency departments, and medical-surgical units. Nurses in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) face particularly high stress due to factors such as high mortality rates, severe illness, and ethical dilemmas (Ramírez-Elvira et al., 2021).

This intervention also focuses on RNs who endure extended work hours, high patient-to-nurse ratios, and insufficient support and acknowledgment from their supervisors. It excludes other healthcare professionals like nursing assistants or licensed practical nurses, whose roles and responsibilities differ within the healthcare system.

The scope of this intervention is to provide tailored strategies and support to this specific group of RNs to mitigate the risk of nursing burnout and enhance their well-being and the quality of patient care they provide.

Definitions Section

In this project, it’s important to clarify some complex terms to aid understanding among individuals outside the healthcare field. Here are explanations of key terms used in nursing burnout prevention guidelines:

  • Registered Nurse (RN): An RN is a healthcare professional who has completed a nursing program and passed the National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX) to obtain a license for nursing practice.
  • Burnout: Burnout refers to a state of physical, emotional, and psychological exhaustion caused by prolonged and intense stress. It occurs when individuals feel overwhelmed, emotionally drained, and unable to achieve their goals (Smith et al., 2023). In the context of nursing, burnout can result from insufficient staffing levels and excessive workload.
  • Interprofessional Collaboration: This term describes the practice of healthcare professionals, such as physicians, social workers, and pharmacists, working together to deliver comprehensive and coordinated care to patients (Peltonen et al., 2019).
  • Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI): The MBI is a tool used to measure burnout rates among healthcare professionals. It assesses three dimensions of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (Williamson et al., 2018).
  • Nursing Stress Scale (NSS): The NSS is a psychological assessment tool designed to measure stress levels specifically among nurses. It is commonly used in research to study the impact of nursing-related stress on nurses’ physical and mental health, job satisfaction, and causes of stress (Bautista et al., 2019).
  • Job Satisfaction: Job satisfaction refers to an individual’s overall positive or negative feelings toward their job or occupation. It reflects the extent to which employees believe that their job meets their expectations, needs, and desires (BasuMallick, 2021).

Policy Statement

This policy aims to combat nurse burnout within our medical center through a comprehensive quality improvement plan. It mandates that all staff nurses adhere to evidence-based guidelines and practices outlined in the policy. The medical center’s administration is responsible for providing the necessary resources to support the plan’s objectives. The policy incorporates strategic measures such as stress reduction techniques, counseling services, fostering compassion, and implementing mentorship programs for nurses.

The organization anticipates a significant reduction in stress among the target population following the policy’s implementation. Specifically, the policy aims to alleviate stress and burnout among nurses by addressing workload issues and ensuring adequate staffing levels to enhance job satisfaction and improve patient care quality. Implementing this policy at the right time is critical to maintaining overall healthcare quality and ensuring the success and sustainability of the plan (O’Donoghue et al., 2021).

Instructions for Policy Implementation – Step-by-Step

Below are the detailed steps for implementing a policy within six months to address nursing burnout among registered nurses in a healthcare setting:

  • Identify Factors Contributing to Burnout: Engage nurses in identifying key factors contributing to burnout. Utilize the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) tool to evaluate emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (Williamson et al., 2018).
  • Assess Stress Levels: Implement a mobile-based electronic survey using the Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) to assess stress levels among nurses (Hendy et al., 2020). Ensure nurses feel comfortable providing honest responses without organizational pressure.
  • Optimize Staffing and Workload: Address burnout by recruiting additional nursing staff to maintain appropriate patient-nurse ratios. This initiative aims to reduce workload, stress, and job dissatisfaction among nurses (Opoku et al., 2022).
  • Provide Follow-up Counseling: After nurses encounter challenging situations, offer follow-up counseling to support their well-being and reduce burnout (Vincent-Höper et al., 2020). Allocate resources for additional personnel to conduct these counseling sessions as needed.
  • Implement Mentorship Programs: Develop mentorship programs to support both new and experienced nurses. Investing in leadership roles for nurses through mentoring can enhance job satisfaction and retention rates (Ephraim, 2021).
  • Foster Compassionate Work Environment: Promote empathy and compassion within the organization to alleviate stress among nurses (Ren et al., 2020). Valuing nurses’ contributions can lead to improved patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Nursing burnout presents a significant challenge in healthcare settings, impacting both nurse well-being and patient care quality. Contributing factors such as inadequate staffing, excessive workloads, and lack of support necessitate a comprehensive approach to addressing burnout. This includes identifying these contributing factors and utilizing validated tools like the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) to assess stress levels. Implementing evidence-based interventions such as optimizing staffing levels, providing follow-up counseling, and fostering a compassionate work environment are essential components of this approach.

To sustain positive outcomes and drive long-term improvements, it is imperative to implement effective policies and procedures tailored to the specific needs of registered nurses (RNs) in high-stress environments. These initiatives are crucial for enhancing nurse well-being, improving job satisfaction, and ultimately elevating the quality of patient care within healthcare settings. Ongoing evaluation and adaptation of these interventions are critical to ensure continued success in combating nursing burnout and promoting a supportive work environment for healthcare professionals. By prioritizing evidence-based strategies and supportive measures, healthcare organizations can proactively address nursing burnout and enhance overall healthcare outcomes.

References

BasuMallick, P. K. (2021). A study of job satisfaction among healthcare employees. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 5(5), 142–150.

Bautista, R. E., Salazar, A. B., Taboada, C. A., & Andal, D. B. (2019). Factors affecting job stress among nurses in a tertiary hospital in Bacolod City. Journal of Nursing Research, 12(4), 282–291.

Ephraim, N. (2021). Mentoring in nursing education: An essential element in the retention of new nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(2), 306–319.

Galischa, H., & Sutrimo, A. (2022). Nursing Burnout and the quality of patient care in Indonesia. International Journal of Nursing Science, 12(1), 45–56.

Hendy, A., Abozeid, A., Sallam, G., Abboud Abdel Fattah, H., & Ahmed Abdelkader Reshia, F. (2020). Predictive factors affecting stress among nurses providing care at COVID‐19 isolation hospitals in Egypt. Nursing Open, 7(2).

O’Donoghue, A., Razi, R., Mouton, A., & Seibert, C. (2021). A study on improving burnout rates among nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(3), 513–521.

Opoku, D. A., Ayisi‐Boateng, N. K., Mohammed, A., Sulemana, A., Gyamfi, A. O., Owusu, D. K., Yeboah, D., Spangenberg, K., Ofosu, H. M., & Edusei, A. K. (2022). Determinants of burnout among nurses and midwives at a tertiary hospital in Ghana: A cross‐sectional study. Nursing Open, 10(2).

Peltonen, L. M., Aho, A. V., Koivu, A., & Valimaki, M. (2019). Interprofessional collaboration and educational outcomes in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 76(11), 234–239.

Ren, Y., Song, H., Li, S., & Xiao, F. (2020). Mediating effects of nursing organizational climate on the relationships between empathy and burnout among clinical nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(11), 290–298.

Smith, J., Sutherland, C., & Christopher, M. (2023). Nursing Burnout and quality patient care: A review of literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(4), 511–519.

Vincent-Höper, S., Stein, M., Nienhaus, A., & Schablon, A. (2020). Workplace aggression and burnout in nursing—The moderating role of follow-up counseling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3152.

Williamson, K., Lank, P. M., Cheema, N., Hartman, N., & Lovell, E. O. (2018). Comparing the Maslach burnout inventory to other well-being instruments in emergency medicine residents. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 10(5), 532–536.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8030 Creation of Policy or Procedure Nursing Paper Assignment

Description

Create a new policy for the medical center based on evidence using the attached Hospital Policy template.

Introduction

Quality improvement begins with the end in mind. Up until now, you have researched the practice problem and developed a focused, evidence-based intervention to address a patient safety problem. The next step would be to implement the practice change and evaluate the change to determine the effect it had on the population. Now, developing a policy will help sustain the change.

Along the way, you will learn that as a leader in a health care organization, you will not only facilitate the steps of evidence-based practice, but you will apply evidence-based leadership strategies to serve as a role model for decision making in your organization. Your skills and ability to promote and encourage evidence-based behavior and decision making among staff, providers, and other leaders will be invaluable to creating and sustaining an evidence-based organization and a culture of evidence. Your own leadership style will influence how you support and model evidence-based processes at your organization.

Introduction

The purpose of this assessment is to complete the stages in the EBP process, translating the research into practice. You will be developing a policy or procedure to address a patient safety issue in a healthcare setting. Incorporate information from prior assessment where appropriate.

Scenario

As the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence, it is your responsibility to ensure that the best practices and protocols are implemented and sustained at the medical center. The next step is to translate the evidence into practice. Policy development is an important final step. Without a formal policy or guideline, it is likely the change will not become permanent. Policies and procedures standardize care which in turn, improves patient safety.

Instructions

Create a new policy for the medical center based on evidence, using the  Hospital Policy Template [DOCX] .

  1. Review the template before you begin filling in each section, and gather any materials or documentation you will need.
  2. In the Subject/Title of Policy section of the  Hospital Policy Template [DOCX] , type the name of the policy.
  3. In the Purpose section, explain the purpose of the policy in 1-2 short paragraphs. Include the following:

. Summarize the patient safety issue.

. Explain the gap or a problem in a health care or public health situation that caused the issue.

. Use supporting evidence from the literature to show how it determined the need.

. Explain how the evidence was gathered.

. Include your revised PICO(T) question.

. Explain why it was necessary to take action with the development of this policy.

  1. In the Population Affected by the Policy section, identify and describe the populations affected by the change and how the scope of the problem was determined.

. Scope is the extent of the problem, or how wide-sweeping the issue is for the target population and the community.

. Describe the target population to be addressed by an intervention in enough detail that it is clear what population is included or excluded.

  1. In the Definitions section, create definitions that explain the industry specific terms used throughout the document needed for the understanding of the policy.

. Explain the terms in a manner that is descriptive to non-industry personnel.

  1. In the Policy Statement section, create a policy statement in a 3-5 sentence paragraph that includes the following:

. State the organization’s declaration of the plans giving a timeframe and scope of the policy implementation.

. Explain the organization’s intentions or goal regarding the patient safety issue.

. Clearly describe the policy plans, explaining that this is a quality improvement project based on evidence-based practices to address a specific patient safety issue.

  1. In the Procedure section, elaborate on the step-by-step procedure that was outlined in the policy statement above in enough detail that one could replicate the process based on your description alone.

. Information needs to be clear and easy to read. Avoid using wordy paragraphs.

. Describe all the processes involved. This section could be in a numbered list or a detailed flowchart. Include the following:

. All participants with their specific responsibilities listed.

. Step-by-step description of the logistical flow of how the policy is to be implemented.

. Instructions for completing each step.

. Any supplies that may be needed.

. If a protocol or guideline already exists for your patient safety issue, use additional guidelines and literature to revise and create a procedure using your own words.

  1. In the Resources section, include a complete reference list of all sources used in the development of the protocol as part of the policy template. Use APA format for the citations.

Additional Resources

  • Use the  Hospital Policy Template [DOCX] provided.
  • No smaller than 11 point font, Times New Roman.
  • Single spaced format within the template.
  • Minimum of 12 resources.
  • APA formatting for citations and reference list

Hospital Policy Template

(Under each heading, write the information needed for the section. Once each section is completed, delete all instructions in parentheses.)

Subject/Title of Policy:

Purpose:

(1–2 short paragraphs. Include the following: 

Summarize the patient safety issue. Explain the gap or a problem in a health care or public health situation that caused the issue.

Use supporting evidence from the literature to show how it determined the need. Explain how the evidence was gathered.

Include your revised PICO(T) question.

Explain why it was necessary to take action with the development of this policy.)

Population Affected by the Policy:

(2–3 sentences.Describe the target population to be addressed by an intervention in enough detail that it is clear what population is included or excluded.) 

Definitions:

(Explain any industry specific terms used throughout the document needed for the understanding of the policy. Define in a manner that is descriptive to non-industry personnel.)

Policy Statement:

(3–5 sentence paragraph. Include the following:

State the organization’s declaration of the plans, giving a timeframe and scope of the policy implementation.

Explain the organization’s intentions or goals regarding the patient safety issue.)

Procedure:

(Elaborate on the step-by-step procedure that was outlined in the policy statement above in enough detail that one could replicate the process based on your description alone.)

References:

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at NursingCustomWriting.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

NURS FPX 8030 Methods and Measurement Nursing Paper Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 4 Methods and MeasurementNURS FPX 8030 Assessment 4 Methods and Measurement

NURS FPX 8030 Methods and Measurement Nursing Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 4 Methods and Measurement

Assignment Overview

This assessment task requires students to develop a comprehensive paper focusing on patient safety issues within the healthcare setting, exploring the evidence-based practice (EBP) process. Specifically, students will identify and evaluate tools suitable for assessing and measuring the effectiveness of proposed practice changes.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

In this assignment, students will:

  • Identify and evaluate tools or instruments applicable for assessing the effectiveness of a proposed practice change aimed at addressing a patient safety issue.
  • Explain the origin, construct, and type of measurement of the selected instruments, emphasizing scientific validity and reliability.
  • Analyze relevant literature to support the rationale behind choosing the identified instruments, including studies demonstrating their use and outcomes.
  • Demonstrate proficiency in academic writing, adhering to third-person perspective and APA formatting guidelines.

The Student’s Role

Assuming the role of the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence, students are tasked with ensuring the implementation of best practices and protocols to enhance patient safety within medical centers. The assignment requires students to investigate and propose suitable measurement tools to evaluate the success of specific interventions addressing patient safety concerns.

Competencies Measured

This assessment aims to measure students’ proficiency in:

  • Assessing the quality of research methods reported in peer-reviewed health care literature.
  • Interpreting the results and practical significance of health care data analyses within the evidence-based practice process.
  • Producing original written work that synthesizes information from credible sources in compliance with Capella University Writing Standards.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner Course:

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 1 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2 Evidenced Based Literature: Search and Organization Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 5 Creation of Policy or Procedure Example

NURS FPX 8030 Methods and Measurement Nursing Paper Example

Introduction

Nursing burnout is a prevalent issue among nurses, often resulting from heavy workloads, inadequate staffing levels, and workplace stress. To evaluate and address this problem effectively, tools such as the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Nursing Stress Scale are commonly used. These tools help assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at mitigating burnout and improving nursing practice. Additionally, implementing the LEAN model can facilitate changes in nursing practice to reduce burnout and enhance overall processes and outcomes.

Instruments for Evaluation of Implementations Plan

To resolve issues of stress and burnout among nurses, it’s crucial for Directors of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence in healthcare settings to assess the suitability of proposed interventions. This assessment can be achieved using appropriate evaluation tools or scales.

The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) stands out as a gold standard and widely used tool for measuring burnout among healthcare professionals, including nurses. Developed by Christina Maslach and Susan E. Jackson, the MBI comprises three subscales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Through the MBI, one can evaluate the effectiveness of interventions by observing changes in scores across these subscales. Its reliability has been demonstrated through extensive research spanning more than twenty-five years (Williamson et al., 2018).

Gray-Toft and Anderson developed the Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) in 1981 to assess stress levels experienced by nurses in their work environment. Composed of scores divided into various stress states, the NSS can identify sources and levels of stress among nurses, aiding in evaluating intervention effectiveness (Hendy et al., 2020).

NSS is appropriate for use in evaluating interventions for nursing burnout due to its specificity for nursing stress, addressing issues directly relevant to nurses’ work environments (Alharbi & Hasan, 2019).

Construct Analysis

The MBI assesses burnout across emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment dimensions. Emotional exhaustion refers to feelings of being drained and exhausted from work, depersonalization involves a negative or distant attitude towards patients, and personal accomplishment relates to feelings of competence and achievement in one’s work. This tool employs a 7-point Likert scale for responses, providing comprehensive insight into burnout levels (Williamson et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2022).

The NSS is a self-report questionnaire consisting of 34 items that evaluate stressors inherent in the nursing role, relationships with other healthcare professionals, work environment factors, and coping resources. It employs a 5-point Likert scale for responses, allowing for a detailed assessment of stress levels among nurses (Hendy et al., 2020).

Validity and Reliability

Both the MBI and NSS have undergone rigorous validation through statistical analyses, including factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability (Mert et al., 2020; Todorovic et al., 2021). These analyses ensure the consistency, stability, and validity of these measures. They have been extensively used in research and practice globally, with translations available in multiple languages to facilitate their use in diverse healthcare settings.

Credible Resources and Their Outcomes

In-depth research into the application of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) has highlighted several valuable studies that can assist nurses in utilizing these assessment tools effectively. Various keywords were employed to access relevant literature from academic databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, and Cochrane.

Erwan et al. (2020) conducted a case study to analyze burnout syndrome among hospital nurses using the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS). The study involved 100 nurses from three public hospitals who completed the questionnaire. The findings revealed that most nurses experienced elevated emotional exhaustion, a significant indicator of burnout. Surprisingly, fewer nurses reported high levels of depersonalization, suggesting they did not feel distant or cynical towards patients. Moreover, there was a notable lack of professional fulfillment among these nurses, particularly those under 20 years old.

Another study by Hendy et al. (2020) examined predictive factors affecting stress among nurses caring for COVID-19 patients in isolation hospitals in Egypt. The authors identified various demographic and work-related factors contributing to stress during the pandemic. The study, based on the Nursing Stress Scale (NSS), revealed that insufficient training, work burden, and reduced assistance were the top stressors. Notably, work-related issues such as inadequate resources, lack of personal protective equipment, and insufficient training on infection prevention and control significantly predicted stress levels among nurses.

The Rationale for Credible Resources

The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) were selected for this study due to their extensive validation and widespread use in addressing nursing burnout. When seeking to apply the MBI and NSS in studies similar to our PICOT analysis on nursing burnout, nurses should conduct comprehensive literature reviews. Peer-reviewed journals like PubMed, CINAHL, and Nursing Open, along with hospital guidelines, are valuable resources for locating related studies. Additionally, exploring other assessment tools such as the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), Nurse Stress Index (NSI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) can provide a broader understanding. Combining two or more tools can enhance the assessment of burnout interventions. A recent study comparing the CBI and OLBI with the MBI among doctors found that the CBI is an effective alternative to the MBI (Ogunsuji et al., 2022).

The rationale behind consulting such informative and credible literature is that it helps nurses utilize different tools, parameters, or their combinations to assess and compare their reliability in addressing burnout and stress among nurses effectively.

Similarities

Several studies, like our project in this course, have utilized one or more assessment instruments to evaluate burnout in nursing and the effectiveness of interventions. Many interventions, such as mentorship, compassion, and counseling, have been employed across studies to address burnout. For instance, Vincent-Höper et al. (2020) implemented follow-up counseling as an intervention immediately after nurses faced patient aggression, while Hofmeyer et al. (2020) emphasized compassion and sympathy towards nurses to address burnout. Furthermore, similar statistical analyses have been used to analyze and interpret data collected from these instruments.

Differences

Various studies have employed different instruments and parameters to assess nursing burnout, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), or Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL). For instance, Tan et al. (2020) used the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) to examine burnout and related factors among different healthcare workers. Differences in populations, demographics, and sample sizes across studies may impact the generalizability of findings. Some studies focus on specific aspects of burnout, such as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, or reduced personal accomplishment, whereas our project broadly examines burnout and stress in nurses.

Conclusion

In addressing the risk and prevalence of burnout and stress among nurses, employing validated tools like the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) is essential. These instruments offer valuable insights into nurses’ experiences of burnout and stress, allowing for targeted interventions. However, it is crucial to ensure the validation and suitability of these tools within specific contexts, considering factors such as sample size, demographics, and the quality of parameters utilized.

While existing literature provides a foundation for understanding nursing burnout interventions, further studies are warranted to explore the effectiveness of interventions and the application of diverse assessment instruments. Future research should focus on refining intervention strategies tailored to nurses’ unique stressors and evaluating the comparative effectiveness of different assessment tools in real-world healthcare settings. This ongoing investigation will contribute to the development of evidence-based approaches to mitigate burnout and promote nurses’ well-being.

References

Alharbi, J., & Hasan, A. A. (2019). Assessment of nursing stress among healthcare professionals: A case study. International Journal of Healthcare, 5(2), 78-92.

Erwan, F., Iqbal, M., Hasanuddin, I., Zuhri, S., & Maydini, C. M. (2020). Burnout syndrome analysis among hospital nurses using Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS): A case study. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 931, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/931/1/012025

Hendy, A., Abozeid, A., Sallam, G., Abboud Abdel Fattah, H., & Ahmed Abdelkader Reshia, F. (2020). Predictive factors affecting stress among nurses providing care at COVID‐19 isolation hospitals at Egypt. Nursing Open. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.652

Lin, Y. H., Chen, C. Y., & Lin, C. Y. (2022). Measurement equivalence of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among medical students: A nationwide study in Taiwan. BMC Medical Education, 22, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03260-3

Mert, D. G., Sahin, E. M., & Kara, D. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Burnout Scale among healthcare professionals: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(19-20), 3877-3886. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15463

Ogunsuji, O., Ogundipe, H., Adebayo, O., Oladehin, T., Oiwoh, S., Obafemi, O., Soneye, O., Agaja, O., Uyilawa, O., Efuntoye, O., Alatishe, T., Williams, A., Ilesanmi, O., & Atilola, O. (2022). Internal reliability and validity of Copenhagen Burnout Inventory and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory compared with Maslach Burnout Inventory among Nigerian resident doctors: A pilot study. Dubai Medical Journal, 5(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521376

Todorovic, L., Babic, A., & Jovanovic, M. (2021). Examination of the reliability and validity of the Nursing Stress Scale: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(9), 3745-3755. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15026

Vincent-Höper, S., Stein, M., Nienhaus, A., & Schablon, A. (2020). Workplace aggression and burnout in nursing—The moderating role of follow-up counseling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093152

Williamson, A. M., Sanderson, J., & Loder, J. (2018). Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization in the Maslach Burnout Inventory: A cross-national study. International Journal of Stress Management, 25(2), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000046

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8030 Methods and Measurement Nursing Paper Assignment

Description

This assessment requires you to put all of your research together in the longest paper in the course, 5-7 pages, including theories and models, the target population, and evaluation tools for assessing the impact of the proposed intervention.
Concepts, theories, and models serve several key functions in health care improvement and help answer the “what, how, and why” for performance improvement. Quality Improvement (QI), concepts, theories, and models help translate research to practice.
Think about a theory or model that will facilitate the implementation of the project. For example, if you anticipate resistance from the stakeholders, or the population undergoing a change, consider aligning a change theory with the model for improvement. Or, if the project focuses on a process change, consider the LEAN model or Donabedian’s Structure, Process, Outcomes model.
Next, focus on identification of the population. Ask yourself, “Who is undergoing the practice change, and who will benefit from the practice change?” Think about how you may want to identify your population. What are the demographics of the population? For example, can they be described by age, generation, socio-cultural determinants, geographic area, gender, or ethnicity? If the population affected includes the staff or providers of care, how might you describe these participants? If the affected population is the patient(s), consider human subject risk when evaluating the literature pertaining to the intervention.
Finally, this assessment also includes how evidence-based instruments are used in health research to generate analyzable data. Sometimes, biometric instruments (such as MRI and laboratory testing), demographic surveys or questionnaires, and psychosocial instruments are used as screening tools to explore relationships between variables of interest. Not all improvement studies require the use of a tool or survey. If you decide to use a tool or survey for the safety initiative, make sure the tool is evidence-based and has been validated for reliability.

Introduction

In this course, we are focusing on a patient safety issue of your choice and working through the steps of the EBP process. In this assessment, identify a tool or tools that could be used to evaluate the intervention.

Scenario

As the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence, it is your responsibility to ensure that the best practices and protocols are implanted throughout the medical center. To further your quest to address a specific patient safety issue, you need to investigate the best measurement tools that could be used to evaluate if the intervention was a success.

Instructions

Write a two-page paper to explain the method and process of evaluating the proposed practice change.
Follow guidelines from previous assessments to write an introduction paragraph to provide organization for the paper.
Write in the third person, adhering to conventions of academic tone. Reference Capella Writing Center: Tone and writing in third person.
Identify two instruments that could be used to assess and evaluate the proposed practice change.
Identify instruments appropriate for determining the effectiveness of a specific intervention.
Briefly describe the origin or originator of each instrument (including the inventor, creator, or company).
Explain the construct it measures, weeks or scales, type of measurement (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods).
If using a survey for either assessment or evaluation of the intervention, describe the scientific validity and reliability (alpha).
Identify the relevant studies from the literature where the instruments were used.
Include a description of the results of the studies.
Describe how the studies differed or if there are similarities to your project.
Explain the rationale for why the instrument was chosen and provide supporting evidence from the literature.
Follow guidelines from previous assessments to write a summary paragraph to provide a closing for the paper.

Additional Requirements

Two-page paper, not including the reference page.
Double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 point font.
Minimum of four resources.
Write in third person.
Include introduction and summary paragraphs.
Include a reference page in APA format.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 3:Assess the quality of the research methods reported in peer-reviewed health care literature.
Explain the origin of each instrument, the construct it measures, and the type of measurement, including validity and reliability if it is a survey.
Identify the literature where the instruments have been used including the results of the studies.
Competency 5: Interpret the results and practical significance of health care data analyses in the evidence based practice process.
Identify two instruments that could be used to assess and evaluate the proposed practice change.
Explain the rationale for why the instrument was chosen and provide supporting evidence from the literature.
Competency 6: Produce original written work, in compliance with the Capella Writing Standards, which is a creative synthesis of information from credible sources.
Introduce and summarize the paper in introduction and closing paragraphs to provide organization for the paper.
Write in the third person, adhering to conventions of academic tone.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at NursingCustomWriting.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

NURS FPX 8030 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Paper Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based LiteratureNURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature

NURS FPX 8030 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature

Assignment Overview

The NURS FPX 8030 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Paper is designed to enhance your understanding of scholarly publication appraisal within evidence-based practice (EBP) and its application in healthcare settings. This assessment focuses on evaluating the quality and relevance of research articles, developing annotated bibliographies, and proposing evidence-based interventions to address patient safety issues.

Assignment Objectives

By completing this assignment, you will:

  • Develop skills in critically appraising scholarly publications to assess validity, bias, and relevance.
  • Refine your ability to synthesize evidence from peer-reviewed literature to propose evidence-based interventions.
  • Apply EBP principles to identify and evaluate interventions for healthcare improvement.

The Student’s Role

As a student in NURS FPX 8030, your role is to act as a healthcare professional responsible for assessing and improving patient safety within a clinical setting. This assignment simulates real-world scenarios where evidence-based decision-making is crucial for implementing effective interventions.

Competencies Measured

This assignment measures several key competencies:

  • Differentiating qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research methods found in healthcare literature.
  • Assessing the quality of research methods reported in peer-reviewed health care literature.
  • Interpreting the results and practical significance of healthcare data analyses in the evidence-based practice process.
  • Producing original written work that synthesizes information from credible sources in compliance with academic standards.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner Course:

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 1 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2 Evidenced Based Literature: Search and Organization Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 4 Methods and Measurement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 5 Creation of Policy or Procedure Example

NURS FPX 8030 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Paper Example

Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature

Critical appraisal of evidence-based literature is a systematic process of evaluating research studies to assess the validity, relevance, and reliability of the evidence presented. This evaluation is crucial for informing healthcare decision-making and improving patient outcomes. In this paper, we focus on the issue of nurse burnout and explore interventions to address this challenge based on a thorough analysis of relevant literature.

Introduction

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented demands on healthcare systems, profoundly affecting nursing staff and exacerbating the pervasive issue of nurse burnout. The research underscores the significant rise in burnout rates among nurses during this crisis, with studies indicating that up to 70% of healthcare professionals experience burnout-related symptoms. This surge in burnout is further compounded by the persistent shortage of nursing staff, amplifying workloads and intensifying stress levels among frontline healthcare providers.

Addressing nurse burnout is imperative not only for preserving the well-being of healthcare professionals but also for safeguarding patient safety and maintaining high standards of care delivery. The detrimental effects of burnout, such as reduced job satisfaction and compromised mental health, can directly impact the quality of patient care and contribute to adverse patient outcomes. This paper employs evidence-based literature to explore interventions aimed at reducing burnout and improving job satisfaction among nursing professionals.

Revised PICOT Question

  • Population: Nursing professionals working in hospital settings
  • Intervention: Participation in a stress-releasing program
  • Comparison: No intervention or standard practice
  • Outcome: Reduction in burnout and improvement in job satisfaction
  • Timeframe: Over a period of six months

Thesis Statement

Participation in stress-relieving programs for nursing professionals in hospital settings can significantly reduce burnout and enhance job satisfaction over a six-month period.

Clinical Appraisal Tool: GRADE

The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) tool is a widely recognized critical appraisal framework utilized to evaluate evidence across various health issues, not limited to nurse burnout (Andrade et al., 2019). This tool provides a systematic approach to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations derived from research studies, enabling evidence-based decision-making in healthcare settings.

In the context of healthcare interventions, the GRADE tool considers multiple dimensions of evidence quality. Study design plays a crucial role in determining the level of evidence, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) typically considered higher quality due to their ability to establish causal relationships (Andrade et al., 2019). This emphasis on study design ensures that interventions recommended based on GRADE assessments are supported by robust evidence.

Moreover, the GRADE approach evaluates the risk of bias within individual studies, acknowledging potential sources of systematic error that could influence research outcomes (Andrade et al., 2019). By accounting for bias, the GRADE tool enhances the reliability and credibility of evidence-based recommendations.

Inconsistency and indirectness are additional criteria considered by the GRADE tool. Inconsistency refers to discrepancies in findings across studies, while indirectness relates to the relevance and applicability of study outcomes to the specific health issue under consideration (Andrade et al., 2019). These criteria ensure that GRADE assessments are contextually relevant and aligned with the specific healthcare needs and populations being studied.

Imprecision and publication bias are further aspects evaluated by the GRADE tool. Imprecision refers to the uncertainty surrounding effect estimates due to small sample sizes or wide confidence intervals, while publication bias addresses the tendency for studies with positive outcomes to be published more frequently, potentially skewing the overall evidence base (Andrade et al., 2019).

By systematically evaluating these dimensions of evidence quality, the GRADE tool provides a structured and transparent method for synthesizing research findings and generating evidence-based recommendations across a wide range of health issues. This approach supports healthcare decision-makers in selecting interventions that are not only effective but also grounded in the best available evidence, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and healthcare quality (Andrade et al., 2019).

Rationale for Choosing the GRADE Tool

The GRADE method was chosen for its comprehensive and robust approach to evaluating evidence quality and generating transparent recommendations. This tool is recognized for its ability to systematically assess various critical factors within research studies, ensuring that healthcare decisions are grounded in the most reliable and up-to-date evidence available.

One key aspect of the GRADE method is its systematic evaluation of study design, which allows for the critical assessment of the quality of evidence. This includes considerations of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, qualitative research, and other study designs to gauge the strength and reliability of the evidence presented. By evaluating study design, the GRADE tool helps researchers and decision-makers discern the level of confidence that can be placed in the study outcomes.

Furthermore, the GRADE method assesses bias risk, which is crucial for understanding the potential limitations or sources of distortion within research findings. Bias can significantly impact the validity and reliability of evidence, and the GRADE tool provides a structured approach to identifying and addressing bias within individual studies.

In addition to study design and bias risk, the GRADE method considers other critical factors such as inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. These factors collectively contribute to a comprehensive appraisal of the evidence, ensuring that healthcare decisions are informed by a nuanced understanding of the strengths and limitations of the available research.

Ultimately, by utilizing the GRADE tool, researchers and healthcare professionals can make evidence-based recommendations with a high degree of transparency and confidence. This method promotes accountability in decision-making processes, ensuring that interventions and policies are supported by the best available evidence and are more likely to achieve positive outcomes in clinical practice and healthcare delivery.

Annotated Bibliography

Lin et al. (2018)

Lin et al. (2018) conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effects of a modified Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program on nurses’ stress, affect, resilience, and work satisfaction levels at general hospitals in mainland China. The study found that participation in the modified 8-week MBSR program resulted in decreased stress and harmful affect levels, improved positive affect and resilience, and a trend towards increased work satisfaction among the intervention group.

The findings of Lin et al. (2018) are relevant to the PICOT issue as they suggest that stress-relieving interventions like the modified MBSR program could potentially help nurses avoid burnout and experience greater work satisfaction. This research supports the development of stress-reduction plans for nurses within healthcare organizations, aiming to enhance work satisfaction and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Ma et al. (2021)

Ma et al. (2021) explored the roles of servant leadership and psychological safety in mitigating nurse burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a quantitative research approach with data from 443 nurses in public hospitals in Pakistan, the study found a significant inverse relationship between psychological safety and nurse burnout, indicating that psychological safety mediates the effect of servant leadership on reducing burnout among nurses.

The research by Ma et al. (2021) has important implications for nurse management, emphasizing the need for human resource management policies that prioritize servant leadership training for nursing leaders. Implementing servant leadership practices can foster psychological safety among nursing professionals, leading to reduced burnout and increased work satisfaction, which positively impacts patient safety and healthcare quality.

Haizlip et al. (2020)

Haizlip et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional survey among nurses at a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States to explore the impact of “mattering” on nurse burnout and engagement. The study revealed that perceiving oneself as valued and cared for by others was associated with reduced burnout and increased engagement among nurses.

The findings of Haizlip et al. (2020) underscore the importance of mattering in promoting nurse well-being and engagement, suggesting that healthcare organizations can implement interventions to enhance matters among nurses, such as creating supportive work environments and recognizing nurses’ contributions to patient care.

Hofmeyer et al. (2020)

Hofmeyer et al. (2020) conducted a narrative review to explore strategies for promoting compassion and reducing burnout among nurses. The authors highlight the role of health system leaders in fostering compassionate work environments, providing adequate support and resources, and prioritizing nurses’ self-care and well-being. The study emphasizes the ethical dimensions of caring for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

The research by Hofmeyer et al. (2020) offers valuable insights for health system leaders and policymakers, guiding efforts to promote compassion and reduce burnout among nurses by addressing organizational factors and ethical considerations within healthcare environments.

Evaluation of Resources with Quality Appraisal Tool

In evaluating the quality of evidence from the selected studies using the GRADE tool, it is important to consider the strength of recommendations and levels of evidence. Lin et al. (2018) conducted a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), which is considered to provide a high level of evidence. The study utilized validated questionnaires to assess stress, mood, resilience, and work satisfaction, which are relevant outcomes for the research question. However, the study had limitations such as the lack of participant and researcher blinding, which could introduce bias. Additionally, the study was conducted only in mainland China, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations. Considering these constraints, the overall quality of evidence from this study may be moderate, and the recommendation can be viewed as weak.

Ma et al. (2021) employed a cross-sectional design, which typically provides lower levels of evidence compared to an RCT. The study used validated questionnaires to measure nurse burnout, psychological safety, and servant leadership. However, the use of a convenience sample and the cross-sectional nature of the study make it challenging to establish causation. Despite these limitations, the study’s results aligned with prior research and were relevant to the research question. Given the limitations, the overall quality of evidence for this study may be considered poor, and the recommendation may be viewed as weak.

Haizlip et al. (2020) also utilized a cross-sectional survey design to assess mattering, burnout, and engagement among nurses. The study used validated measures along with demographic and work-related factors. Similar to the previous study, the use of a convenience sample and cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causation. However, the study’s findings were consistent with existing research and relevant to the research issue. Due to these limitations, the overall quality of evidence for this study may be rated as poor, and the recommendation may be considered weak.

Hofmeyer et al. (2020) employed a narrative review approach, which typically provides lower levels of evidence compared to an RCT or systematic review. The study reviewed existing literature on compassion and burnout in nursing, examining various initiatives to promote compassion and reduce burnout. While the study’s findings were consistent with prior research and relevant to the research issue, the lack of a systematic search and selection of literature may introduce bias. Overall, the quality of evidence from this study may be considered low, and given the study’s limitations, the recommendation may be viewed as of poor quality.

The studies reviewed provide valuable insights into factors that can enhance well-being and help mitigate nursing burnout. Despite varying levels of evidence and limitations, these studies contribute valuable information to guide strategies for addressing nurse burnout and promoting well-being within healthcare settings.

Intervention for Current Issue

Drawing from evidence-based sources, a combination of strategies can effectively mitigate nurses’ burnout and improve patient care outcomes. These strategies include fostering a compassionate work environment and providing support for nurses, promoting servant leadership, offering follow-up counseling, emphasizing the importance of mattering, and implementing mentorship programs. This multifaceted intervention is based on a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature and is designed to significantly enhance nursing outcomes while reducing burnout.

To address patient safety concerns in healthcare settings, three key interventions have been identified based on a thorough evaluation of evidence-based literature.

Firstly, establishing standardized communication protocols among healthcare teams can reduce the risk of misunderstandings and medical errors. Miscommunication is a leading cause of adverse events, which can be mitigated through the use of electronic medical records or structured communication methods like the SBAR approach.

Secondly, the adoption of patient safety checklists during clinical procedures such as surgeries, medication administration, and patient transfers can prevent errors by ensuring all necessary steps are followed. Checklists serve as a reminder for healthcare professionals to take essential safety precautions and confirm critical information.

Thirdly, increasing patient engagement and participation in healthcare decision-making can enhance patient safety outcomes. Empowering patients to voice their concerns, report safety issues, and actively participate in their care can significantly contribute to improving patient safety and reducing medical errors.

It is important to align these interventions with best practices at the state or national level while also considering local patient and organizational preferences. Regular evaluation and adaptation of these interventions based on performance assessments are crucial to achieving optimal patient safety outcomes and delivering high-quality care.

Advantages

The proposed multifaceted intervention not only addresses workload management and resource support for nurses’ mental health but also provides a comprehensive solution to mitigate stress and burnout, improve patient care outcomes, and enhance nurses’ job satisfaction.

Analysis of Evidence

The recommended intervention aims to reduce nursing burnout through various supportive measures such as compassion, mentorship, mattering, servant leader support, and counseling. Regular counseling sessions and attentive listening from servant leaders can provide nurses with an outlet to express their concerns and alleviate stress. This strategy emphasizes the importance of creating a supportive environment where nurses feel valued and empowered, ultimately contributing to the successful implementation of the intervention.

Conclusion

Addressing nurse burnout is essential for maintaining healthcare quality and ensuring the well-being of nursing professionals. Evidence-based interventions such as stress-reducing programs, compassionate leadership, and enhanced patient engagement offer promising strategies to mitigate burnout and improve job satisfaction among nurses. By synthesizing findings from a comprehensive review of evidence-based literature, this paper highlights the importance of effective interventions that address workload management, mental health support, and organizational factors to promote nurse well-being and enhance patient care outcomes. Utilizing critical appraisal tools like the GRADE method enables healthcare decision-makers to select interventions grounded in robust evidence, ultimately contributing to improved patient safety and healthcare quality.

References

Andrade, C., et al. (2019). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(5), 83-86. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_222_19

Haizlip, J., et al. (2020). Mattering: How can organizations, patients, and peers affect nurse burnout and engagement? JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(5), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000882

Hofmeyer, A., et al. (2020). Fostering compassion and reducing burnout: How can health system leaders respond in the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond? Nurse Education Today, 104502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104502

Lin, X., et al. (2018). Effects of modified mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on stress, affect, and resilience in general hospital nurses. Psychological Reports, 121(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117714319

Ma, Y., et al. (2021). Curbing nurses’ burnout during COVID‐19: The roles of servant leadership and psychological safety. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13414

Vincent-Höper, S., et al. (2020). Workplace aggression and burnout in nursing—The moderating role of follow-up counseling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093152

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8030 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Paper Assignment

Description

Write a 5-7 page paper that includes an introduction and thesis statement. Develop an annotated bibliography that highlights important articles that support the thesis statement. Based on the evidence presented, propose one or more evidence-based interventions for the patient safety issue.

Collapse All

Introduction

Assessing the relevance and quality of a scholarly publication is an essential skill for the refinement of evidence-based knowledge. You will learn about specific study methods and designs, and then you will be able to determine the level of evidence a study represents in EBP.

EBP plays an important role throughout the development of your capstone project, including selecting a researchable topic for improvement. For this assessment, you will learn about different appraisal tools, including a rapid appraisal, to apply in the EBP process. You will also learn how to conduct a comprehensive appraisal of qualitative research and how to translate qualitative evidence into practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).

You will also evaluate interventions from the evidence-based literature for merit and appropriateness. Some examples might include a particular type of evidence-based therapy, a new policy, a quality improvement initiative, et cetera. Consider these questions:

  • Would the intervention be an appropriate solution for the clinical or practice problem?
  • Is the intervention feasible for the organization?
  • What type of resistance might we encounter?
  • What impact could the outcome have on the organization?

Reference

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate and critically appraise the available evidence pertaining to the patient safety issue. This is an important step in the evidence-based practice process. The evidence should be appraised for merit, implicit bias, and relevance to the topic. Moreover, evidence should be from current, peer reviewed sources. Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements are usually updated every 10 years. Consider this guideline when evaluating the current literature.

Scenario

Keeping with the previous scenario, remember that as Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence, it is your responsibility to ensure that the best practices and protocols are implanted throughout the medical center. This includes ensuring the use of quality literature.

Instructions

Write a 5-7 page paper that includes an introduction and thesis statement. Develop an annotated bibliography that highlights important articles that support the thesis statement. Based on the evidence presented, propose one or more evidence-based interventions for the patient safety issue.

  1. Review the Capella Library Guide on how to Create an Annotated Bibliography.
  2. Review the Capella Library Guide on how to Critically Appraise the Evidence.
  3. Review the Capella Writing Center Guide, In-text Citation: Paraphrasing, Summarizing, Quoting, focusing on how to paraphrase.
  4. Create an introductory paragraph that includes a summary of the health care safety problem, your PICO(T) research question, and a thesis statement.
  1. Revise a summary of the health care safety problem that you have created from one of your previous assessments.
    1. Improve it with details from the evidence and scholarly writing traits.
  2. Revise your PICO(T) question based on what you have learned in your research.
      • Apply PICO(T) components within the question appropriately.
      • Refine PICO(T) components with detail and specificity.
      • Compose a professional level PICO(T) question that the researcher might have used as a foundation for the study.
  1. Write a strong thesis statement. Review the Capella Writing Center Guide, Writing a Strong Thesis Statement.
  1. Explain in a paragraph the critical appraisal tool that you are using to evaluate your articles.
    1. Include a statement about why you selected this critical appraisal tool.
  1. Choose five articles from literature published within the last five years and write an annotative bibliography for each article. Each annotation should include the following:
    1. Type the APA citation for each article, and underneath it, include the following in the annotation:
    2. Write a brief summary of the study in the article in your own words, including the purpose, method, design, and results.
      • Include examples from the study to illustrate the quality of the study.
      • Provide scholarly support for the assertions made in your appraisal of the study.
      • Evaluate the quality of the study by applying a critical appraisal tool.
    1. Explain why the article is relevant to the patient safety issue.
      • Provide context about how the study contributes to the body of literature.
  1. Propose 1-3 interventions that may improve or solve the patient safety problem.
    1. Interventions selected must come from evidence-based literature analysis.
    2. Interventions should also be crafted based on consideration of what is already recognized as best practice in your state or nationally, knowledge gained through experience and other experts, and local patient or organizational preferences.
  2. Write a closing summary paragraph.
  3. Submit a complete reference list of all sources used in the development of the protocol in APA format.

Additional Requirements

  • 5-7 pages, not including references.
  • Double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 point font.
  • Minimum of eight resources, including textbook and course resources.
  • Include the following headings to organize your paper:
    • Critical Appraisal Tool.
    • Annotative Bibliography.
    • Proposed Intervention.
  • Reference page in APA format with appropriate citations.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 2: Differentiate qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research methods found in the literature.
    • Evaluate the resource quality using the critical appraisal tool including scholarly support.
  • Competency 3: Assess the quality of the research methods reported in peer-reviewed health care literature.
    • Explain in a paragraph the critical appraisal tool used to evaluate articles.
    • Annotate each article by summarizing the study purpose, method, design, results, and context about how the study contributes to body of literature.
  • Competency 5: Interpret the results and practical significance of health care data analyses in the evidence based practice process.
    • Propose an intervention that addresses the patient safety issue within a clinical or health care setting, supported by evidence-based analysis and consideration of recognized best practice.
  • Competency 6: Produce original written work, in compliance with the Capella Writing Standards, which is a creative synthesis of information from credible sources.
    • Write a scholarly introduction paragraph that includes the summary of the patient safety issue, the PICOT research question, and an appropriate thesis statement.
    • Summarize the paper in a well-organized closing paragraph.
    • Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at NursingCustomWriting.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

NURS FPX 8030 Evidenced Based Literature Search and Organization Paper Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2 Evidenced Based Literature: Search and OrganizationNURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2 Evidenced Based Literature: Search and Organization

NURS FPX 8030 Evidenced Based Literature Search and Organization Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2 Evidenced Based Literature: Search and Organization

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will engage in the evidence-based practice (EBP) process by conducting a literature search related to a patient safety issue of your choice. You will apply the steps of EBP, particularly focusing on the acquisition of the best evidence to support potential interventions for addressing the identified health care challenge. The assignment involves creating a PRISMA diagram and a narrative paper that outlines your literature search process and findings.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objective of this assignment is to demonstrate proficiency in conducting an evidence-based literature search using a structured approach. You will develop a research question using the PICO(T) format, identify appropriate databases and search terms, utilize search filters to locate relevant articles, and critically evaluate the gathered evidence. The assignment aims to strengthen skills in synthesizing information from credible sources and applying APA formatting guidelines.

The Student’s Role

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role is to act as a researcher engaging in an evidence-based practice project. You will assume the responsibilities of a director of clinical operations and nursing excellence, tasked with addressing a patient safety issue within a healthcare setting. Your goal is to identify evidence-based interventions supported by credible literature to improve health care outcomes.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner Course:

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 1 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 4 Methods and Measurement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 5 Creation of Policy or Procedure Example

NURS FPX 8030 Evidenced Based Literature Search and Organization Paper Example

Introduction

Nurse burnout is a pervasive issue in healthcare settings, characterized by emotional, physical, and psychological exhaustion among nurses due to factors like high workloads and stressful environments. According to recent studies, the prevalence of nurse burnout has escalated, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (Bergman et al., 2021). As the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence, addressing this challenge with evidence-based interventions is paramount for improving both nurse well-being and patient outcomes.

Patient Safety Issue and PICOT Statement

The patient safety issue at hand is nurse burnout, impacting the quality of care and nurse retention rates. The PICOT question guiding this evidence-based project is:

Does implementing a mindfulness-based stress reduction program (I) for registered nurses working in hospital settings (P), compared to no intervention (C), lead to a reduction in nurse burnout and improvement in job satisfaction (O) over a period of 6 months (T)?

In this context:

P: Registered nurses working in hospital settings

I: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program

C: No intervention or standard stress management programs

O: Reduction in nurse burnout and improvement in job satisfaction

T: Over a period of 6 months

Literature Search Process

The literature search process was guided by the PICOT question to identify relevant evidence. Initial keywords included “nurse burnout,” “stress among nurses,” “mindfulness-based stress reduction,” “hospital settings,” and “job satisfaction.” Utilizing databases like CINAHL and Google Scholar, articles were filtered based on peer-review status, publication date (within the last five years), and availability of full text online.

Keywords and Databases

Choosing appropriate keywords and databases was critical for refining the search strategy. Keywords such as “registered nurses,” “hospital environments,” and “mindfulness-based stress reduction program” were instrumental in retrieving relevant literature. Boolean operators (AND, OR) were employed to expand or narrow the search results, ensuring specificity and relevance (Corrin et al., 2022).

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years, specifically addressing mindfulness-based stress reduction programs among registered nurses in hospital settings. Exclusion criteria eliminated studies unrelated to the PICOT question or lacking peer-review status. This process yielded a selection of high-quality, pertinent articles for analysis.

Articles Reviewed

Several key articles were identified during the literature search:

  • Alenezi et al. (2019) investigated the effects of a program aimed at reducing burnout among mental health nurses, emphasizing the importance of addressing emotional and physical fatigue.
  • Cocchiara et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review on the use of yoga to manage stress and burnout in healthcare workers, highlighting alternative interventions for stress reduction.
  • Chesak et al. (2019) explored stress management and resiliency training in a nurse residency program, providing insights into effective strategies for coping with workplace stress.

These articles provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in reducing nurse burnout and improving job satisfaction (Green & Kinchen, 2021).

PRISMA Diagram and Research Log

A PRISMA diagram was created to visualize the literature search process, illustrating database searches, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and article selection. The diagram highlights the systematic approach adopted to identify and analyze relevant evidence. Furthermore, a detailed research log was maintained using tools like RefWorks to organize search strategies and document findings for transparency and reproducibility.

PRISMA Diagram

(See Appendix 1)

Research Log

Search Strategy Development:
    • Keywords: nurse burnout, stress among nurses, mindfulness-based stress reduction, hospital settings, job satisfaction.
    • Databases Used: CINAHL, Google Scholar.
    • Search Filters: Peer-reviewed publications, full text available online, publication date within the last 5 years.
Database Search Results:
    • CINAHL: 150 articles identified.
    • Google Scholar: 200 articles identified.
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria:
    • Inclusion Criteria: Peer-reviewed articles published within the last 5 years, focused on mindfulness-based stress reduction among registered nurses in hospital settings.
    • Exclusion Criteria: Non-peer-reviewed articles, irrelevant topics, publication date older than 5 years.
Article Screening and Selection:
    • Initial screening based on titles and abstracts.
    • Full-text review of selected articles based on relevance to PICOT question.
Final Article Selection:
    • Four articles selected for inclusion in the review based on relevance, quality, and alignment with research objectives.
Key Findings:
    • Identified effective interventions for reducing nurse burnout and improving job satisfaction.
    • Highlighted the importance of mindfulness-based stress reduction programs in healthcare settings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing nurse burnout through evidence-based interventions is imperative for enhancing patient care and nurse well-being. By leveraging mindfulness-based stress reduction programs, healthcare organizations can mitigate nurse burnout and foster a healthier work environment. This comprehensive review underscores the importance of evidence-based practice in promoting nursing excellence and patient safety.

References

Alenezi, A., McAndrew, S., & Fallon, P. (2019). Burning out physical and emotional fatigue: Evaluating the effects of a program aimed at reducing burnout among mental health nurses. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(5), 1045-1055.

Cocchiara, R. A., Peruzzo, M., Manock, A., Ottolenghi, L., Villari, P., Polimeni, A., & La Torre, G. (2019). The use of yoga to manage stress and burnout in healthcare workers: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(3), 284.

Chesak, S. S., Morin, K. H., Cutshall, S., Carlson, M., Joswiak, M. E., Ridgeway, J. L., & Sood, A. (2019). Stress management and resiliency training in a nurse residency program: Findings from participant focus groups. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 35(6), 337-343.

Corrin, L., Thompson, K., Hwang, G.-J., & Lodge, J. M. (2022). The importance of choosing the right keywords for educational technology publications. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 1–8.

Green, A. A., & Kinchen, E. V. (2021). The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Stress and Burnout in Nurses. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 39(4), 089801012110158.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8030 Evidenced Based Literature Search and Organization Paper Assignment

Description

Conduct research, create a PRISMA diagram, and write a 1-2 page narrative paper to describe the review process.

Introduction

How do you find the best evidence to answer PICO(T) questions? In EBP, it is essential to use your PICO(T) question and its components as the foundation of your search for the most relevant, best evidence to answer the question and address a health care challenge. Peer reviewed journals contain research studies with evidence to:

  1. Support the need to improve the health care challenge you have identified in the PICO(T) question.
  2. Substantiate potential interventions that will improve the problem you have identified. Make sure the identified strategies and interventions are supported by the evidence-based literature and other credible sources. The strength of the evidence should be from a credible, peer reviewed source and evaluated for merit.

Use the PICO(T) question to conduct a thorough review of the literature. Likewise, it is crucial to master your skills using health care databases to conduct the search. Also, utilize the Capella library resources.

Introduction

This assessment is a continuation of the steps of the EBP process. The purpose of the next step is to identify information available regarding the patient safety issue by obtaining literature to support potential interventions. The acquisition of literature starts with the search.

Scenario

As we have discussed previously, in this course we are focusing on a patient safety issue of your choice and working through the six steps of the EBP process. We explored the step of “Ask the clinical question” with the first assessment and now we will look at the second step “Acquire the best evidence.”

Keeping with the previous scenario and your role as the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence, it is your responsibility to ensure that the best practices and protocols are implanted throughout the medical center. Your primary goals are to focus on problems in health care safety and how to solve them with evidence-based interventions as a quality improvement (EBP/QI) project.

Instructions

Conduct research, create a PRISMA diagram, and write a 1-2 page narrative paper to describe the review process, using the following steps:

  1. Review the Capella library guide,  Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences .
  2. Review the resource on how to use and create a PRISMA diagram.
  3. Using keywords derived from your PICO(T) question, use the available search engines to locate four EBP articles.

. Use filters, such as: items with full text online, peer-reviewed publications, and publications within the last five years.

  1. Use library tools, PRISMA, the Research Log spreadsheet, and RefWorks to organize and keep track of your search process.

. Be prepared to explain in a brief narrative report the steps in the process that you followed to find your literature sources.

  1. Create a PRISMA diagram to illustrate your research process.

. Complete the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews, including searches of databases and registers only.

. PRISMA. (2021).  PRISMA flow diagram  http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram.aspx

. You will use this to complete the diagram required for your assessment.

. University of North Carolina Health Sciences Library. (2021).  Creating a PRISMA flow diagram  https://guides.lib.unc.edu/prisma

. This library guide gives step-by-step instructions for how to create a PRISMA flow diagram.

. Or create your own diagram using the PRISMA Flow Diagram Shinny App.

. Include this document as an appendix after your reference page.

  1. Create a 1-2 page paper to describe your exhaustive search process and include a PRISMA diagram. Include the following in your paper:

. A brief statement of the patient safety issue and the research question in the PICO(T) format for the EBP/QI project you have been investigating.

. Identify evidence related to a gap or problem in a health care or public health situation.

. Explain how the evidence was gathered.

. Create a narrative paragraph describing the literature search process, as illustrated in your PRISMA diagram.

. Include details of your exhaustive search process.

. List all keywords or search phrases, filters used, each database used, and how many articles were found with each search.

. Explain what the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the articles were.

. Explain how many articles were retained and why.

Additional Requirements

  • Submit 1-2 page paper, not including reference page.
  • Times New Roman, 12 point font.
  • Minimum of four resources.
  • Reference page in APA format.
  • Submit 1-page PRISMA diagram in the appendix after the reference page.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Apply the steps of the evidence based practice process to a health care challenge.

. Describe a brief statement of the patient safety issue and the research question in the PICOT format.

. Create a PRISMA diagram for a new systematic review.

  • Competency 2: Differentiate qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research methods found in the literature.

. Identify appropriate databases and key words as part of a search strategy for evidence.

  • Competency 3: Assess the quality of the research methods reported in peer-reviewed health care literature.

. Explain the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the articles retained, how many articles were retained, and why.

  • Competency 4: Describe the theory and conceptual framework that informs an investigation and/or methodology.

. Create a complete narrative of the literature search process including search strategies.

  • Competency 6: Produce original written work, in compliance with the Capella Writing Standards, which is a creative synthesis of information from credible sources.

. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

RUBRIC

1, Describe a brief statement of the patient safety issue and the research question in the PICOT format. Describes a statement of the patient safety issue, the PICOT question, and identifies evidence related to a gap or problem in a health care or public health situation

2, Create a complete narrative of the literature search process including search strategies. Explains in a complete narrative a search strategy for the best evidence, based on a PICOT question.

3, Identify appropriate databases and key words as part of a search strategy for evidence. dentifies appropriate databases and robust key words as part of a search strategy for the best evidence.

4, Explain the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the articles retained, how many articles were retained, and why.

Explains the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the articles retained, how many articles were retained, and thorough explanation of why articles were retained and how they directly relate to the issue.

5, Create a PRISMA diagram for a new systematic review. Creates a professional level PRISMA diagram for a new systematic review.

6, Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA formatting of in-text citations and references.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at NursingCustomWriting.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

NURS FPX 8030 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Paper Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 1 Building the Case for Healthcare ImprovementNURS FPX 8030 Assessment 1 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement

NURS FPX 8030 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 1 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will engage in evidence-based practice (EBP) by identifying a patient safety issue within a healthcare setting and proposing a quality improvement (QI) project to address this challenge. The goal is to apply the six-step EBP process to develop a comprehensive understanding of the problem, evaluate supporting evidence, and propose evidence-based interventions.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objective of this assignment is to develop a deep understanding of the EBP process and its application in healthcare quality improvement. You will identify a pertinent patient safety issue, explore internal and external evidence supporting the need for change, assess organizational priorities, and propose interventions with desired patient outcomes.

The Student’s Role

You will assume the role of a Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence at a major metropolitan medical center. As a frontline leader, you are responsible for identifying and addressing healthcare safety issues using evidence-based interventions.

Competencies Measured

By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate proficiency in the following competencies:

  • Apply the steps of the evidence-based practice process to a healthcare challenge:
    • Identify a patient safety issue requiring improvement.
    • Describe the significance of the issue to stakeholders and justify its organizational priority.
    • Explain desired patient outcomes and the potential impact of a quality improvement project.
  • Interpret the results and practical significance of health care data analyses in the evidence-based practice process:
    • Document external sources from literature that support the need for change.
  • Produce original written work, complying with Capella Writing Standards:
    • Conduct a professional presentation using well-designed slides and slide notes.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner Course:

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2 Evidenced Based Literature: Search and Organization Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 4 Methods and Measurement Example

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 5 Creation of Policy or Procedure Example

NURS FPX 8030 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Paper Example

Introduction

Ensuring patient safety is paramount in healthcare, aiming to prevent clinical errors and minimize patient suffering. A significant obstacle to achieving optimal patient safety is the persistent nursing shortage. This paper will delve into the critical issue of the nursing shortage, exploring its impact through internal and external evidence, organizational implications, and proposing a comprehensive quality improvement project to address this pressing challenge.

Patient Safety Issue: Nursing Shortage

The shortage of nursing staff is a crucial factor significantly influencing patient outcomes and healthcare quality. Extensive research underscores the direct correlation between adequate staffing levels and improved patient outcomes, including reduced hospital stays and mortality rates (Smith et al., 2020; Jones & Brown, 2019). In the United States, this challenge is compounded by a rapidly aging population, which places increased demand on healthcare services, further straining an already stretched healthcare workforce.

Internal Evidence of Nursing Shortage

Recent research within our healthcare organization highlights concerning trends among nursing staff. Surveys reveal alarmingly low levels of job satisfaction among nurses, with only a minority expressing contentment in their roles. Factors contributing to dissatisfaction include concerns about stability, working conditions, and compensation (Johnson et al., 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated workload pressures, leading to unprecedented levels of burnout and dissatisfaction among nursing professionals.

For instance, a survey conducted by our organization revealed that only 1 in 10 clinical nurses report satisfaction in their current positions. Furthermore, 36% of respondents expressed willingness to stay in their roles if specific improvements were implemented, highlighting the critical need for organizational interventions to address workforce challenges (Anderson & Wilson, 2020).

External Evidence of Nursing Shortage

On a national scale, projections indicate a looming crisis in nursing workforce supply. It is estimated that over the next few years, a significant portion of the nursing workforce will retire, exacerbating the shortage. Additionally, recruitment challenges, limited clinical training opportunities, and stringent regulatory requirements contribute to a shrinking pool of qualified nurses available to meet escalating healthcare demands (Brown & Carter, 2022).

For example, recent studies suggest that by 2022, more than 500,000 registered nurses are expected to leave the workforce, resulting in a deficit of over 1.1 million nurses (Smith et al., 2020). This anticipated shortage underscores the urgent need for strategic interventions to attract and retain qualified nursing professionals.

Organizational Priority for Intervention

The nursing shortage poses a direct and profound threat to patient care quality and safety within our organization. Extensive research has established a clear link between staffing deficiencies and adverse patient outcomes, including increased mortality rates, higher infection rates, and compromised care due to nurse fatigue (Taylor & Rogers, 2018). Addressing this critical issue is imperative to uphold our organizational commitment to providing high-quality care and ensuring patient safety.

For instance, studies have shown that understaffed hospitals experience higher rates of in-hospital mortality, infections, post-operative complications, and patient falls (Brown & Carter, 2022). Moreover, nurse fatigue resulting from prolonged working hours contributes to medication errors and delays in emergency care, further jeopardizing patient safety.

Proposed Quality Improvement Project

To effectively combat the nursing shortage and mitigate its adverse effects, a multifaceted quality improvement project is proposed. This project will focus on enhancing retention strategies, investing in nurse education programs, and leveraging technology to optimize staffing efficiency. Strategies such as implementing flexible scheduling, offering competitive compensation packages, and providing professional development opportunities will be integral to improving nurse satisfaction and retention rates (Anderson & Wilson, 2020).

Desired Patient Outcomes and Organizational Impact

The successful implementation of these interventions is expected to yield several positive outcomes. Improved nurse retention rates will contribute to enhanced patient care experiences, reduced adverse events, and optimized care coordination. By addressing the nursing shortage strategically, our organization aims to create a sustainable solution that positively impacts patient safety and healthcare quality.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the nursing shortage represents a critical healthcare challenge that demands immediate attention and concerted action. By leveraging internal and external evidence, acknowledging the organizational impact, and proposing a comprehensive quality improvement project, we can work towards mitigating the adverse effects of the nursing shortage on patient safety and care quality.

References

Anderson, L., & Wilson, M. (2020). Strategies for addressing the nursing shortage: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Healthcare Management, 45(3), 78-85.

Brown, R., & Carter, S. (2022). The impending nursing shortage: Projections and implications for healthcare organizations. Healthcare Trends, 12(2), 45-52.

Johnson, E., et al. (2021). Job satisfaction among nursing professionals: A survey-based analysis. Nursing Research Quarterly, 30(4), 112-125.

Jones, A., & Brown, K. (2019). Impact of nursing shortages on patient outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Excellence, 15(1), 24-36.

Smith, J., et al. (2020). Forecasting the nursing shortage: Implications for healthcare policy. Health Policy Review, 8(4), 210-225.

Taylor, S., & Rogers, P. (2018). Nurse staffing and patient safety: A critical analysis. Healthcare Quality Journal, 25(2), 56-68.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8030 Building the Case for Healthcare Improvement Paper Assignment

Present a five-minute PowerPoint presentation with voice over to introduce your patient safety issue, the supporting research, and possible intervention.

Introduction

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the process of searching for, appraising, and integrating the most relevant, best research evidence to answer a clinical question or address a health care challenge. The best research evidence is weighed along with patient preferences and values, organizational data, and professional expertise. For this assessment, you will learn about each of the six steps of EBP in detail and acquire a working knowledge about EBP as a problem-solving approach used in many health care settings.

Of note, there are many published processes regarding the steps of EBP. Some processes have more steps and some have fewer. However, the fundamental concepts are the same. For the purposes of organization, we will use the six step EBP process below in the courseroom:

  1. Ask the clinical question.
  2. Acquire the best evidence.
  3. Apprise the evidence.
  4. Implement the evidence.
  5. Evaluating the outcomes.
  6. Disseminate findings.

Introduction

The purpose of this assessment is to identify your patient safety issue and further explain how the safety issue was identified, the impact on safety, and/or descriptions of the problem from clinical experts within your institution. Your goal is to identify internal resources or do a “needs assessment.” The internal resources will not require citation/references. You are welcome to draw from personal experiences and use creative liberty to make your case from an internal perspective.

Scenario

Throughout the course, we will focus on a patient safety issue of your choice and work through all six steps of the evidence-based practice (EBP) process. The first step is to “Ask the burning clinical question in PICOT format,” which you will find later in this assessment in the section titled “Mastering the First Step in EBP: PICOT.”

Now, let’s imagine that you are the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence at a major metropolitan medical center encompassing many entities, including hospitals and outpatient medical centers. You report directly to the Chief Nursing Officer and serve as the front-line leader for clinical operations, including serving as a clinical resource for all nursing staff levels in both the acute-care and ambulatory settings.

It is your responsibility to ensure that the best practices and protocols are implanted throughout the medical center. Your primary goals are to focus on problems in health care safety and how to solve them with evidence-based interventions as a quality improvement (EBP/QI) project.

Instructions

Present a 5-minute PowerPoint presentation with voice over to introduce your patient safety issue, the supporting research, and possible intervention, using the following steps:

Consider patient safety issues that you have heard about in your practice, the medical field, the media, or your coursework. Select a patient safety issue to research throughout this course.

  • Explain the patient safety issue that needs improvement.
  • Describe the problem in detail using creative liberty or give specific examples of the issue in practice.

 Locate and review two examples of internal or practice site sources of evidence that support the need for change to address the patient safety issue.

  • Describe how the sources were obtained, including a timeframe or number of patients involved.
  • The internal resources will NOT require citations and references.

Locate and review two sources of evidence that the safety issue exists outside of your institution.

  • We call these external resources. This information can come from peer-reviewed literature, clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements, local or national databases, national organizations, Joint Commission, and/or hospital compare (CMS). The external resources will require citations and references.
  • Utilize Capella library resources to guide your research, including the library guide and an appointment with a librarian.
  • Explain how these literature resources support the need for change related to the patient safety issue.
  • Describe how each source is directly related to the patient safety issue.

Determine the organizational priority by describing why this patient care safety problem is of significant concern to stakeholders, patients, or community members. Give specific examples.

Describe your desired patient outcomes from a proposed intervention and the potential impact of the quality improvement project. Use at least one citation from literature to support the intervention.

Again, the patient safety issue and intervention or interventions identified for this assessment will also be used for all the assessments in this course, so take a look at those assessments now. Ensure the problem and interventions you select will work for the other four assessments.

Create 10-12 slides that reflect the issue you have selected, the evidence, and the possible interventions. You may use the following headings for your slides:

Title.

Name, course information.

Presentation Outline.

Patient Safety Issue.

Internal Evidence of Patient Safety Issue.

External Evidence of Patient Safety Issue.

Organizational Priority for Intervention.

Describe why problem is significant to stakeholders and give specific examples.

Propose a Quality Improvement Project.

Describe interventions and desired patient outcomes and potential organizational impact.

Include at least one citation from literature to support proposal.

References.

Record voice over for your slide presentation using PowerPoint features or Kaltura.

Submit PowerPoint slide deck with slide notes in PDF or Microsoft Word format and a video recording of your 5-minute presentation.

Additional Requirements

. 10-12 PowerPoint slides with slide notes.

. Five minute voice over recording of presentation slides.

. Minimum two external resources.

. Reference slide with APA citations.

. Submit slide deck, slide notes, and video recording.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

. Competency 1: Apply the steps of the evidence based practice process to a health care challenge.

. Identify a health care safety problem that needs to be improved.

. Describe why this health care safety problem is a concern to stakeholders, patients, or community members and should be an organizational priority.

. Explain your desired patient outcomes and the potential impact of the quality improvement project.

. Competency 5: Interpret the results and practical significance of health care data analyses in the evidence based practice process.

. Document two external sources from literature of evidence that support the need for change.

. Competency 6: Produce original written work, in compliance with the Capella Writing Standards, which is a creative synthesis of information from credible sources.

. Conduct a professional presentation using well designed slides and slide notes.

. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

RUBRICS

1, Identify a health care safety problem that needs to be improved. Identifies a health care safety problem that needs improvement and describes the problem in detail using creative liberty or with specific examples.

2, Document two external sources from literature of evidence that support the need for change. Discusses external sources that support the need for change that are from literature. Explains how source is directly related to the patient safety issue.

3, Describe why this health care safety problem is a concern to stakeholders, patients, or community members and should be an organizational priority. Describes why the health care safety problem is a high priority and is of significant concern to stakeholders, patients, or community members and provides specific examples.

4, Explain your desired patient outcomes and the potential impact of the quality improvement project. Describes the desired state for an intervention in a health care setting and explains the impact of the quality improvement project with at least one citation from literature to support impact.

5, Conduct a professional presentation using well designed slides and slide notes. Conducts a professional presentation using well designed slides and slide notes. Speaks with confidence and explains the issue and intervention without too much jargon.

6, Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA formatting of in-text citations and references.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at NursingCustomWriting.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

NURS FPX 8010 Quality Improvement Proposal Initiative Paper Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 4 Quality Improvement ProposalNURS FPX 8010 Assessment 4 Quality Improvement Proposal

NURS FPX 8010 Quality Improvement Proposal Initiative Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8010 Executive Leadership in Contemporary Nursing

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 4 Quality Improvement Proposal

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will propose a high-level quality improvement initiative targeting a strategic priority within a healthcare organization. Your proposal should be tailored to engage executive leaders and stakeholders effectively, aiming to garner support and buy-in for the proposed initiative.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

This assignment is designed to assess your ability to:

  • Develop a strategic quality improvement initiative aligned with organizational priorities.
  • Utilize effective communication methods to present your proposal to executive leaders and stakeholders.
  • Apply evidence-based practices and theoretical frameworks to support your proposal.
  • Recommend policy changes to facilitate the implementation of the quality improvement initiative.
  • Demonstrate clear and concise communication skills appropriate for the target audience and context.

The Student’s Role

As a healthcare professional and future leader, your role is to analyze existing organizational priorities and identify opportunities for improvement. You will propose a quality improvement initiative aimed at addressing a specific challenge or inefficiency within the organization. Your proposal should demonstrate a deep understanding of the strategic context and consider the perspectives of key stakeholders.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8010 Executive Leadership in Contemporary Nursing Course:

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 1 Political Landscape Analysis Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 2 Strategic Plan Appraisal Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 3 Strategic Plan Development Example

NURS FPX 8010 Quality Improvement Proposal Initiative Paper Example

Introduction

In today’s healthcare landscape, strategic planning is essential for nurse leaders to ensure efficient, effective, and patient-centered care delivery. Strategic priorities guide organizational efforts towards achieving desired outcomes and improving patient experiences (Lal, 2020). This proposal aims to address a critical issue within Life Care Centers regarding communication between providers and patients through the electronic medical records (EMR) system. By implementing a quality improvement initiative focused on improving communication efficiency, we aim to enhance patient satisfaction, strengthen relationships with referral sources, and elevate the overall reputation of Life Care Centers.

Rationale for Establishing a Strategic Priority

Effective communication between providers and patients is fundamental to delivering high-quality care and ensuring positive patient outcomes (Lang, 2012). However, inefficiencies in communication processes, such as delays in message response times, can lead to disruptions in care delivery and impact patient satisfaction. Addressing this strategic priority aligns with the organization’s overarching goal of providing cost-effective, high-quality care while maintaining patient-centeredness.

SWOT Analysis of Chosen Strategic Priority

Strengths:

  • Strong leadership support from executive sponsors, including the CFO and CEO.
  • Access to data and informatics expertise for effective analysis and decision-making.
  • Existing policies and procedures provide a foundation for policy revisions and implementation.

Weaknesses:

  • Inefficient communication processes leading to delays in care and patient dissatisfaction.
  • Lack of clarity regarding responsibilities for message management and response times.
  • Potential resistance to change from providers accustomed to existing communication practices.

Opportunities:

  • Implementation of new policies and procedures to streamline communication processes.
  • Collaboration between stakeholders to identify and address system inefficiencies.
  • Potential for significant improvement in patient satisfaction and organizational reputation.

Threats:

  • Resistance to change from providers and staff members reluctant to adopt new practices.
  • Risk of continued communication inefficiencies leading to further declines in patient satisfaction.
  • External factors, such as technological limitations, impacting the effectiveness of proposed solutions.

Key Performance Indicators for Measuring Success

To measure the success of the quality improvement initiative, key performance indicators (KPIs) will be established, including:

  • Response time to patient messages within designated time frames (e.g., non-urgent messages within 72 hours, urgent messages within 2 hours).
  • Patient satisfaction scores related to communication and overall experience.
  • Number of near-miss events and adverse outcomes associated with communication delays.

Value of Stakeholder Feedback and Collaboration Process

Stakeholder engagement and collaboration are crucial for the success of the quality improvement initiative. Key stakeholders, including executive sponsors, informatics specialists, quality improvement leaders, and frontline staff, will be involved in the planning, implementation, and evaluation phases of the project. Stakeholder feedback will inform decision-making and ensure that proposed changes align with organizational goals and priorities.

Contemporary Change Theory

Lewin’s Change Theory provides a framework for understanding and managing organizational change. By unfreezing existing communication practices, implementing new policies and procedures, and reinforcing desired behaviors, we can facilitate sustainable improvements in communication efficiency (Petiprin, 2020). Engaging stakeholders, providing education and training, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement are essential components of successful change implementation.

Policy Recommendations

Policy recommendations will focus on:

  • Clarifying roles and responsibilities for message management and response times.
  • Establishing clear guidelines for communication via the EMR system, including response time expectations for providers.
  • Regular review and updates of policies to ensure alignment with organizational goals and best practices.

Communication Strategy

Clear and concise communication will be essential for engaging stakeholders and fostering support for the quality improvement initiative (Eichler, et.al, 2018). Regular updates and progress reports will be provided through multiple channels, including team meetings, email communications, and executive summaries. Tailoring communication strategies to the needs and preferences of different stakeholders will ensure effective dissemination of information and promote buy-in for proposed changes.

Conclusion

Improving communication efficiency between providers and patients is critical for enhancing patient satisfaction and maintaining organizational reputation. By addressing this strategic priority through a comprehensive quality improvement initiative, Life Care Centers can optimize care delivery processes, strengthen relationships with referral sources, and ultimately, improve patient outcomes. Through stakeholder collaboration, policy revisions, and continuous monitoring, we aim to achieve sustainable improvements in communication practices and elevate the overall quality of care provided.

References

Eichler HG, Bloechl-Daum B, Broich K, et al. (2018). Data rich, information poor: can we use electronic health records to create a learning healthcare system for pharmaceuticals? Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, September 4. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1226.

Lal, M. (2020). Why You Need a Nursing Strategic Plan. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(4), 183-184. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000863.

Lang EV. (2012). A Better Patient Experience Through Better Communication. J Radiol Nurs, 31(4), 114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2012.08.001.

Petiprin, A. (2020, July 19). Lewin’s change theory. Nursing Theory. Retrieved from https://nursing-theory.org/theories-and-models/lewin-change-theory.php.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8010 Quality Improvement Proposal Initiative Paper Assignment

Assessment 4 Instructions: Quality Improvement Proposal Initiative Assignment

Description

Propose a high-level quality improvement initiative for a selected departmental strategic priority, and choose an effective method of presenting your proposal to executive leaders and other stakeholders in the organization and community.

Introduction

Quality improvement and management in health care has its roots in the business world and the teachings of quality gurus such as W. Edwards Deming, Joseph Juran, Phillip B. Crosby, and Avedis Donabedian. As health care costs rose in the late 1960s, payers wanted assurance that their investments resulted in improved health. More importantly, patients and health care professionals wanted assurance that their participation resulted in safe, effective care with positive long-term benefits.

As 21st century health care organizations strive for high reliability, executive leadership is tasked with keeping the organization focused on quality and safety. In the previous assessments, you identified an organization’s strategic priorities and provided a comprehensive assessment of stakeholder and leadership influence. High-reliability organizations align quality and safety with strategic goals. Your work in previous assessments will help you identify one strategic priority for improvement.

From the nursing unit level to the executive office, quality equates with attention to the processes and functions that drive and support safety, efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction. The DNP-prepared nurse is in a unique position to blend knowledge of systems theory with an understanding of quality management. Added to this mixture is the DNP-prepared nurse’s exquisite appreciation for the holistic needs of individuals and groups.

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to propose a quality improvement initiative that supports a departmental strategic priority.

Preparation

Choose one strategic priority from the departmental strategic plan you developed in Assessment 3 as the focus of a proposed quality improvement initiative. 

Note: The assessments in this course must be completed in the order presented; subsequent assessments should be built on both your earlier work and your instructor’s feedback on earlier assessments. If you choose to submit assessments prematurely, without considering and integrating your instructor’s feedback, your assessment may be returned ungraded, resulting in your loss of an assessment attempt.

Instructions

Develop a presentation of your proposed high-level quality improvement initiative for executive leaders and other stakeholders in the organization and community.

Be creative in showcasing your proposal. Choose a presentation method you consider to be both engaging and likely to garner the necessary support and buy-in. For example, you might consider any of the following methods, or something different.

  • Marketing brochure prefer method
  • Newsletter.
  • Video.
  • Audio or video slide presentation.
  • Executive summary.

Whichever method you choose, consider the information needs of your intended audience, their communication preferences, and possible time constraints on processing your proposal.

Video Recording

If you choose video as your preferred presentation method, Kaltura is the recommended tool for video recording. Refer to  Using Kaltura  for more information about this courseroom tool. You are also free to use any other technology of your choice (such as a video camera or smart phone) to record your video; however, please inform the faculty facilitator of your decision not to use Kaltura to avoid potential technical problems associated with file formats.

To record your video, you will need a built-in or external microphone and/or video camera (webcam or other device). Check that your recording equipment and software is working properly and that you know how to record and submit your video. Be sure to set up and test your equipment ahead of time.

Note: If you use assistive technology or any alternative communication methods to access course content, please contact  DisabilityServices@Capella.edu  with any access-related questions or to request accommodations.

Evaluation

The following tasks correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point in the presentation of your proposed quality improvement initiative. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

  • Explain the rationale for establishing a strategic priority.

. Describe the overarching aim and focus of your proposed quality improvement initiative.

. Use the evidence-based literature to provide broad rationale for establishing this priority.

  • Present the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority.

. Consider the organization’s political landscape and strategic priorities.

  • Identify key performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.

. For example: infection rates, customer satisfaction, financial performance indicators, productivity, nurse satisfaction, or other internal metric.

. These indicators could align with those identified on the departmental balanced scorecard.

  • Explain the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on the proposed quality improvement initiative.

. Identify key stakeholders and explain why their support for this initiative is crucial to its success.

. Explain how you will leverage stakeholder feedback.

  • Explain how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative.
  • Make policy recommendations to support the proposed quality improvement initiative.

. Your recommendations could entail developing a new policy, revising a current policy, or retiring a current policy.

. Describe the policy implications of this initiative and their impact on the organization.

. Justify your recommendations.

  • Communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.

. Consider the needs of your audience.

. Be succinct and mindful of communication best practices.

. Carefully review your media and materials to avoid errors that could distract the audience and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposed initiative.

Portfolio Prompt: You are encouraged to save your quality improvement proposal presentation to your  ePortfolio.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 3: Propose a strategic plan that integrates feedback from other disciplines and aligns with organizational priorities.

. Explain the rationale for establishing a strategic priority.

. Present the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority.

. Identify key performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.

. Explain the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative.

. Explain how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative.

  • Competency 4: Recommend policy changes that support a strategic plan.

. Make policy recommendations to support a proposed quality improvement initiative.

  • Competency 5: Address assessment purpose in effective written or multimedia presentations, incorporating appropriate evidence and communicating in a form and style consistent with applicable professional and academic standards.

. Communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed.

RUBRICS

1, Explain the rationale for establishing a strategic priority. Provides a concise and articulate explanation of the rationale for establishing a strategic priority. The rationale is well supported in the evidence-based literature and reflective of keen insight into the logical implications and consequences of the stated priority.

2, Present the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority. Presents the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority. Key points indicate a perceptive analysis that reflects awareness and due consideration of organizational politics and strategic goals,

3, Identify key performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative. Identifies precise key performance indicators, clearly aligned with strategic priorities, for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.

4, Explain the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative. Provides a concise, articulate explanation of the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on a proposed quality improvement initiative. Presents an effective strategy for collaborating and draws well-reasoned conclusions about the value of stakeholder support

5, Explain how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative. Explains how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative. Applies an insightful interpretation of applicable theory to best practices in change leadership.

6, Make policy recommendations to support a proposed quality improvement initiative. Makes astute policy recommendations to support a proposed quality improvement initiative. Identifies significant and relevant policy implications and provides compelling justification for policy changes.

7, Communicate clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed. Communicates clearly and concisely in a form and style appropriate for the audience and for the substance, purpose, and context of the message being conveyed. Content, form, and style are congruous, engaging, and facilitate audience comprehension. Adheres to all applicable professional, disciplinary, and scholarly communication and design standards.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you feeling overwhelmed with writing your nursing research papers or assignments? Tackling nursing assignments often involves thorough research and the gathering of relevant information and evidence. If you find yourself struggling or lacking the necessary research skills, fret not! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re your reliable nursing writing service, here to ease your academic journey.

Why Choose Our Nursing Paper Writing Services?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, making them accessible to all college students. We understand the financial constraints students face and strive to provide quality assistance at a reasonable cost.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers perfect your paper, bringing in the expertise needed for exceptional results. Our team is composed of professionals who understand the intricacies of nursing assignments, ensuring your work stands out.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Bid farewell to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts are committed to crafting original and customized nursing essays, ensuring academic integrity and success.
  • Timely Support for Your Coursework: Worried about looming deadlines? We’ve mastered the art of helping nursing students with coursework, even with tight timelines. Trust us to save your academic life and ensure timely submissions.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert. We make the process seamless for your convenience.

How We Can Help You To Do Your Nursing Papers:

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our team at NursingCustomWriting.com stays updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Grades: Order Your Nursing Essays Today

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we always endeavor to provide you with the best quality and achieve high levels of customer satisfaction. Order now without hesitation, and let us help you shine in your academic journey!

NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 1 Political Landscape AnalysisNURS FPX 8010 Assessment 1 Political Landscape Analysis

NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8010 Executive Leadership in Contemporary Nursing

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 1 Political Landscape Analysis

Assignment Instructions Overview

This assignment aims to analyze the political landscape of a healthcare organization, focusing on formal and informal power structures and their impact on organizational culture, policies, and communications.

The Student’s Role

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role is to critically evaluate the formal and informal lines of power within the given healthcare organization scenario. You will need to assess how these power dynamics influence decision-making processes, particularly at the executive level, and propose recommendations based on your analysis.

Competencies Measured

This assignment measures several competencies, including:

  • Analyzing formal and informal power structures in an organization.
  • Incorporating organizational power dynamics into executive-level decision-making.
  • Identifying the appropriate source of power for achieving strategic objectives.
  • Recommending policy changes that align with a strategic plan.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8010 Executive Leadership in Contemporary Nursing Course:

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 2 Strategic Plan Appraisal Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 3 Strategic Plan Development Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 4 Quality Improvement Proposal Example

NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Example

Formal and Informal Lines of Power

Formal and informal lines of power are prevalent in healthcare organizations, shaping their functioning and leadership dynamics (Galliers, 2022). In hospitals, formal power is defined by positions like the President, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), outlined in the organizational hierarchy to clarify roles and responsibilities. Conversely, informal power emerges through relationships, trust, and networking within the organization, extending influence beyond formal roles. For example, the CNO holds both formal authority and informal influence, leveraging their position and connections to impact decisions and relationships.

Recognizing the formal power inherent in leadership roles is crucial, but equally important is cultivating informal power through relationship-building (Shirey, 2015). As a new CNO, it’s essential to collaborate with colleagues, respecting their input and fostering a positive work environment (Waring, et.al, 2018). Negative sentiments can undermine organizational cohesion, underscoring the need for maintaining a supportive atmosphere. Research emphasizes the significance of understanding organizational politics in navigating change processes and facilitating effective communication channels.

Comprehending power dynamics is essential for effective leadership in healthcare organizations. By embracing both formal authority and informal influence, leaders can navigate organizational politics and drive positive change within their organizations, fostering collaboration and achieving shared goals.

Organizational Power Influences on Executive-Level Decision-Making

Organizational power dynamics significantly influence executive-level decision-making processes in healthcare organizations. Understanding the rationale behind policies and decisions is crucial for leaders to fulfill their roles effectively (Galliers, 2022). In the constantly evolving healthcare landscape, it’s essential to grasp the implications of policies for successful implementation. Seeking guidance from superiors and exploring alternative solutions are essential practices for new leaders in navigating these complexities.

Adapting to change and effectively communicating with stakeholders are crucial aspects of navigating organizational power dynamics (Waring, et.al, 2018). New leaders must adjust their approach to accommodate diverse perspectives and find solutions that meet the needs of all parties involved. Building trust and fostering collaboration are essential for leveraging both formal and informal power effectively.

Maintaining awareness of the organizational climate and being proactive in identifying opportunities for improvement are vital for success (Shirey, 2015). Strategic agility, the ability to seize opportunities and adapt to new strategies, is crucial in dynamic healthcare environments. Creating a positive work environment and promoting open communication are essential for driving progress and fostering collaboration among stakeholders.

As a new leader, I actively seek guidance from superiors to comprehend the rationale behind policies and ensure their successful execution. By embracing diverse perspectives and fostering collaboration, I aim to leverage both formal and informal power to address challenges and drive positive change.

The Impact of Power on Organizational Policy

Power dynamics significantly shape organizational policies within our healthcare institution (Waring, et.al, 2018). Our Chief Medical Officer (CMO) wields considerable formal and informal authority, owing to years of experience and community influence. While the CMO’s leadership is valued, embracing diverse perspectives is vital for driving innovation and progress. As a newcomer, I aim to offer fresh insights that prioritize diversity and cultural sensitivity in policy development. Collaborative decision-making, inclusive of input from various stakeholders, is crucial for achieving policies that meet the needs of our diverse workforce and patient population. By fostering an environment of open communication and leveraging the expertise of colleagues, we can navigate power dynamics effectively to enact meaningful changes that address pressing challenges, such as the increasing patient workload.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the analysis emphasizes the significant impact of formal and informal lines of power on leadership dynamics and decision-making processes within healthcare organizations. Understanding these power dynamics is essential for effective leadership, enabling leaders to navigate organizational politics and foster positive change. By recognizing and leveraging both formal authority and informal influence, leaders can effectively address challenges, adapt to change, and promote collaboration. Embracing diverse perspectives and fostering open communication are critical for driving innovation and progress in healthcare policy development. Ultimately, navigating power dynamics effectively allows healthcare leaders to enact meaningful changes that meet the needs of their workforce and patient population, thereby contributing to the overall improvement of healthcare delivery.

References

Galliers, R.D., Simeonova, B., & Karanasios, S. (2022). Power dynamics in organizations and the role of information systems. Information Systems Journal, 32(3), 233-241.

Shirey, M.R. (2015). Strategic Agility in Healthcare Leadership. . JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(6), 305-308..

Waring, J., Minister, P., Clarke, J., et al. (2018). Healthcare leadership with political astuteness (HeLPA): a qualitative study of how service leaders understand and mediate the informal “power and politics” of major health system change. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), N.PAG.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Assignment

Assessment 1 Instructions Political Landscape Analysis

NURS FPX 8010 Capella Formal & Informal Power in Healthcare Organizations Assessment

Description

Using the case scenario provided, write a 3-page analysis of the organization’s political landscape, including formal and informal power structures at play and their impact on culture, policy, and communications.

Introduction

Understanding the political landscape of an organization is key when developing strategic priorities. Knowing the key players and how to leverage relationships will help you develop a strategic plan that is meaningful to all stakeholders. Gaining stakeholder buy-in is the key to success when attempting to meet the strategic goals outlined on a balanced scorecard.

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to gain insight into organizational power structures and their effects on organizational culture, policies, and communications.

Preparation

For this assessment, use the following case scenario:

You are a new nurse executive at a community-based hospital system in the southeastern region of the United States. The system is not-for-profit and serves five rural counties. The system comprises one flagship hospital, three smaller critical access hospitals, and a number of clinics and urgent care centers. The health care system serves a diverse population of insured, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured patients. The hospital is Joint Commission accredited and for three years in a row has been rated as a Top 100 Hospital.

Historically, the hospital system has been physician-centric, meaning that the physician staff have had the power to influence change, policy, and protocol. The current chief executive officer (CEO) was recently hired from a large university-affiliated hospital system. The chief medical officer (CMO) started the organization’s orthopedic program (one of the most lucrative service lines) and has been with the organization for more than 25 years. He is well respected in the local community and serves on a number of community boards. In light of this strong influence from the department of medicine, nursing has struggled over the past five years. You are the second chief nursing officer (CNO) in four years. The hospital board is applying pressure to seek Magnet designation, which was recently lost due to poor leadership by your predecessor.

The hospital has recently adopted the hospitalist model to cover all in-patients. The hospitalist group was developed by physician leaders in the organization and operates as a separate department within the organization. The hospitalist group desires to become a limited liability corporation (LLC) to maximize benefit offerings but needs a larger staff to make this happen. They have presented a proposal to executive leadership to transfer all advance practice registered nurses (APRNs) working in the organization (there are more than 50) to the hospitalist group, which is housed under the department of medicine. The CMO is spearheading this initiative. Traditionally, ARPNs were hired and managed by the department of nursing.

As the new CNO, you have been approached by a group of 15 APRNs who are against the transition as it will severely impact their scope of practice, in addition to affecting their paid time off, salary, and work hours. The CMO has offered to make APRNs eligible for the annual physician hospitalist bonus structure, as an incentive. At the same time, the CMO has informally proposed that a new policy be created for APRN hospital privileges. If the APRNs choose not to join the hospitalist group, they will not be eligible for hospital privileges. In the state in which the organization is located, a supervising physician is required for APRN practice.

Instructions

Analyze the organization’s political landscape. Examine formal and informal power structures at play and how they affect organizational culture, policies, and communications at all levels.

Analysis Format and Length

Format your document using APA style.

. A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.

. A running head on all pages.

  • Use the following section headings to ensure thorough content coverage and flow.

. Formal and Informal Lines of Power.

. Organizational Power Influences on Executive-Level Decision-Making.

. The Impact of Power on Organizational Policy.

. Sources of Power.

  • Provide a short conclusion to your analysis in the form of a summary or editorial.
  • Your analysis should be 3 pages in length, excluding the title and references pages.

Evaluation

The following tasks correspond to the grading criteria in the assessment scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

  • Analyze the formal and informal lines of power within the organization in the case study.
  1. Describe the informal and formal lines of power within this organization.
  2. What source of power is being used by the different stakeholders? For example: authority, rewards, coercion, expertise, reputation, personal power.
  3. Describe the effects of power structures on organizational culture, policies, and communications at all levels.
  • Incorporate organizational power dynamics as a factor in executive-level decision making.
  1. Based on your analysis of internal power structures and your perspective as CNO, what would be the best way to respond to the concerns of the ARPNs in this scenario, and why?
  2. What support for your response can be found in the evidence-based literature?
  3. What underlying assumptions might influence your decision making?
  • Assess the potential impact or influence of power on this change in organizational policy.
  1. What is the basis for your conclusions?
  • Identify the appropriate source of power for achieving the CNO’s primary strategic objective.
  1. For example: authority, rewards, coercion, expertise, reputation, personal power.
  2. What evidence do you have to support your conclusion?
  • Articulate meaning relevant to the main topic, scope, and purpose of the prompt. 
  1. Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.
  2. Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards.
  3. Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your analysis.
  • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 2: Analyze formal and informal power structures in an organization.
    • Analyze the formal and informal lines of power within an organization.
    • Incorporate organizational power dynamics as a factor in executive-level decision-making.
    • Identify the appropriate source of power for achieving a primary strategic objective.
  • Competency 4: Recommend policy changes that support a strategic plan.
    • Assess the potential impact or influence of power on organizational policy.
  • Competency 5: Address assessment purpose in effective written or multimedia presentations, incorporating appropriate evidence and communicating in a form and style consistent with applicable professional and academic standards.
    • Articulate meaning relevant to the main topic, scope, and purpose of the prompt.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you feeling overwhelmed with writing your nursing research papers or assignments? Tackling nursing assignments often involves thorough research and the gathering of relevant information and evidence. If you find yourself struggling or lacking the necessary research skills, fret not! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re your reliable nursing writing service, here to ease your academic journey.

Why Choose Our Nursing Paper Writing Services?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, making them accessible to all college students. We understand the financial constraints students face and strive to provide quality assistance at a reasonable cost.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers perfect your paper, bringing in the expertise needed for exceptional results. Our team is composed of professionals who understand the intricacies of nursing assignments, ensuring your work stands out.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Bid farewell to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts are committed to crafting original and customized nursing essays, ensuring academic integrity and success.
  • Timely Support for Your Coursework: Worried about looming deadlines? We’ve mastered the art of helping nursing students with coursework, even with tight timelines. Trust us to save your academic life and ensure timely submissions.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert. We make the process seamless for your convenience.

How We Can Help You To Do Your Nursing Papers:

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our team at NursingCustomWriting.com stays updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Grades: Order Your Nursing Essays Today

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we always endeavor to provide you with the best quality and achieve high levels of customer satisfaction. Order now without hesitation, and let us help you shine in your academic journey!

NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 1 Political Landscape AnalysisNURS FPX 8010 Assessment 1 Political Landscape Analysis

NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 8010 Executive Leadership in Contemporary Nursing

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 1 Political Landscape Analysis

Assignment Instructions Overview

This assignment aims to analyze the political landscape of a healthcare organization, focusing on formal and informal power structures and their impact on organizational culture, policies, and communications.

The Student’s Role

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role is to critically evaluate the formal and informal lines of power within the given healthcare organization scenario. You will need to assess how these power dynamics influence decision-making processes, particularly at the executive level, and propose recommendations based on your analysis.

Competencies Measured

This assignment measures several competencies, including:

  • Analyzing formal and informal power structures in an organization.
  • Incorporating organizational power dynamics into executive-level decision-making.
  • Identifying the appropriate source of power for achieving strategic objectives.
  • Recommending policy changes that align with a strategic plan.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 8010 Executive Leadership in Contemporary Nursing Course:

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 2 Strategic Plan Appraisal Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 3 Strategic Plan Development Example

NURS FPX 8010 Assessment 4 Quality Improvement Proposal Example

NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Example

Formal and Informal Lines of Power

Formal and informal lines of power are prevalent in healthcare organizations, shaping their functioning and leadership dynamics (Galliers, 2022). In hospitals, formal power is defined by positions like the President, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), outlined in the organizational hierarchy to clarify roles and responsibilities. Conversely, informal power emerges through relationships, trust, and networking within the organization, extending influence beyond formal roles. For example, the CNO holds both formal authority and informal influence, leveraging their position and connections to impact decisions and relationships.

Recognizing the formal power inherent in leadership roles is crucial, but equally important is cultivating informal power through relationship-building (Shirey, 2015). As a new CNO, it’s essential to collaborate with colleagues, respecting their input and fostering a positive work environment (Waring, et.al, 2018). Negative sentiments can undermine organizational cohesion, underscoring the need for maintaining a supportive atmosphere. Research emphasizes the significance of understanding organizational politics in navigating change processes and facilitating effective communication channels.

Comprehending power dynamics is essential for effective leadership in healthcare organizations. By embracing both formal authority and informal influence, leaders can navigate organizational politics and drive positive change within their organizations, fostering collaboration and achieving shared goals.

Organizational Power Influences on Executive-Level Decision-Making

Organizational power dynamics significantly influence executive-level decision-making processes in healthcare organizations. Understanding the rationale behind policies and decisions is crucial for leaders to fulfill their roles effectively (Galliers, 2022). In the constantly evolving healthcare landscape, it’s essential to grasp the implications of policies for successful implementation. Seeking guidance from superiors and exploring alternative solutions are essential practices for new leaders in navigating these complexities.

Adapting to change and effectively communicating with stakeholders are crucial aspects of navigating organizational power dynamics (Waring, et.al, 2018). New leaders must adjust their approach to accommodate diverse perspectives and find solutions that meet the needs of all parties involved. Building trust and fostering collaboration are essential for leveraging both formal and informal power effectively.

Maintaining awareness of the organizational climate and being proactive in identifying opportunities for improvement are vital for success (Shirey, 2015). Strategic agility, the ability to seize opportunities and adapt to new strategies, is crucial in dynamic healthcare environments. Creating a positive work environment and promoting open communication are essential for driving progress and fostering collaboration among stakeholders.

As a new leader, I actively seek guidance from superiors to comprehend the rationale behind policies and ensure their successful execution. By embracing diverse perspectives and fostering collaboration, I aim to leverage both formal and informal power to address challenges and drive positive change.

The Impact of Power on Organizational Policy

Power dynamics significantly shape organizational policies within our healthcare institution (Waring, et.al, 2018). Our Chief Medical Officer (CMO) wields considerable formal and informal authority, owing to years of experience and community influence. While the CMO’s leadership is valued, embracing diverse perspectives is vital for driving innovation and progress. As a newcomer, I aim to offer fresh insights that prioritize diversity and cultural sensitivity in policy development. Collaborative decision-making, inclusive of input from various stakeholders, is crucial for achieving policies that meet the needs of our diverse workforce and patient population. By fostering an environment of open communication and leveraging the expertise of colleagues, we can navigate power dynamics effectively to enact meaningful changes that address pressing challenges, such as the increasing patient workload.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the analysis emphasizes the significant impact of formal and informal lines of power on leadership dynamics and decision-making processes within healthcare organizations. Understanding these power dynamics is essential for effective leadership, enabling leaders to navigate organizational politics and foster positive change. By recognizing and leveraging both formal authority and informal influence, leaders can effectively address challenges, adapt to change, and promote collaboration. Embracing diverse perspectives and fostering open communication are critical for driving innovation and progress in healthcare policy development. Ultimately, navigating power dynamics effectively allows healthcare leaders to enact meaningful changes that meet the needs of their workforce and patient population, thereby contributing to the overall improvement of healthcare delivery.

References

Galliers, R.D., Simeonova, B., & Karanasios, S. (2022). Power dynamics in organizations and the role of information systems. Information Systems Journal, 32(3), 233-241.

Shirey, M.R. (2015). Strategic Agility in Healthcare Leadership. . JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(6), 305-308..

Waring, J., Minister, P., Clarke, J., et al. (2018). Healthcare leadership with political astuteness (HeLPA): a qualitative study of how service leaders understand and mediate the informal “power and politics” of major health system change. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), N.PAG.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 8010 Political Landscape Analysis Paper Assignment

Assessment 1 Instructions Political Landscape Analysis

NURS FPX 8010 Capella Formal & Informal Power in Healthcare Organizations Assessment

Description

Using the case scenario provided, write a 3-page analysis of the organization’s political landscape, including formal and informal power structures at play and their impact on culture, policy, and communications.

Introduction

Understanding the political landscape of an organization is key when developing strategic priorities. Knowing the key players and how to leverage relationships will help you develop a strategic plan that is meaningful to all stakeholders. Gaining stakeholder buy-in is the key to success when attempting to meet the strategic goals outlined on a balanced scorecard.

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to gain insight into organizational power structures and their effects on organizational culture, policies, and communications.

Preparation

For this assessment, use the following case scenario:

You are a new nurse executive at a community-based hospital system in the southeastern region of the United States. The system is not-for-profit and serves five rural counties. The system comprises one flagship hospital, three smaller critical access hospitals, and a number of clinics and urgent care centers. The health care system serves a diverse population of insured, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured patients. The hospital is Joint Commission accredited and for three years in a row has been rated as a Top 100 Hospital.

Historically, the hospital system has been physician-centric, meaning that the physician staff have had the power to influence change, policy, and protocol. The current chief executive officer (CEO) was recently hired from a large university-affiliated hospital system. The chief medical officer (CMO) started the organization’s orthopedic program (one of the most lucrative service lines) and has been with the organization for more than 25 years. He is well respected in the local community and serves on a number of community boards. In light of this strong influence from the department of medicine, nursing has struggled over the past five years. You are the second chief nursing officer (CNO) in four years. The hospital board is applying pressure to seek Magnet designation, which was recently lost due to poor leadership by your predecessor.

The hospital has recently adopted the hospitalist model to cover all in-patients. The hospitalist group was developed by physician leaders in the organization and operates as a separate department within the organization. The hospitalist group desires to become a limited liability corporation (LLC) to maximize benefit offerings but needs a larger staff to make this happen. They have presented a proposal to executive leadership to transfer all advance practice registered nurses (APRNs) working in the organization (there are more than 50) to the hospitalist group, which is housed under the department of medicine. The CMO is spearheading this initiative. Traditionally, ARPNs were hired and managed by the department of nursing.

As the new CNO, you have been approached by a group of 15 APRNs who are against the transition as it will severely impact their scope of practice, in addition to affecting their paid time off, salary, and work hours. The CMO has offered to make APRNs eligible for the annual physician hospitalist bonus structure, as an incentive. At the same time, the CMO has informally proposed that a new policy be created for APRN hospital privileges. If the APRNs choose not to join the hospitalist group, they will not be eligible for hospital privileges. In the state in which the organization is located, a supervising physician is required for APRN practice.

Instructions

Analyze the organization’s political landscape. Examine formal and informal power structures at play and how they affect organizational culture, policies, and communications at all levels.

Analysis Format and Length

Format your document using APA style.

. A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.

. A running head on all pages.

  • Use the following section headings to ensure thorough content coverage and flow.

. Formal and Informal Lines of Power.

. Organizational Power Influences on Executive-Level Decision-Making.

. The Impact of Power on Organizational Policy.

. Sources of Power.

  • Provide a short conclusion to your analysis in the form of a summary or editorial.
  • Your analysis should be 3 pages in length, excluding the title and references pages.

Evaluation

The following tasks correspond to the grading criteria in the assessment scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

  • Analyze the formal and informal lines of power within the organization in the case study.
  1. Describe the informal and formal lines of power within this organization.
  2. What source of power is being used by the different stakeholders? For example: authority, rewards, coercion, expertise, reputation, personal power.
  3. Describe the effects of power structures on organizational culture, policies, and communications at all levels.
  • Incorporate organizational power dynamics as a factor in executive-level decision making.
  1. Based on your analysis of internal power structures and your perspective as CNO, what would be the best way to respond to the concerns of the ARPNs in this scenario, and why?
  2. What support for your response can be found in the evidence-based literature?
  3. What underlying assumptions might influence your decision making?
  • Assess the potential impact or influence of power on this change in organizational policy.
  1. What is the basis for your conclusions?
  • Identify the appropriate source of power for achieving the CNO’s primary strategic objective.
  1. For example: authority, rewards, coercion, expertise, reputation, personal power.
  2. What evidence do you have to support your conclusion?
  • Articulate meaning relevant to the main topic, scope, and purpose of the prompt. 
  1. Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.
  2. Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards.
  3. Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your analysis.
  • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 2: Analyze formal and informal power structures in an organization.
    • Analyze the formal and informal lines of power within an organization.
    • Incorporate organizational power dynamics as a factor in executive-level decision-making.
    • Identify the appropriate source of power for achieving a primary strategic objective.
  • Competency 4: Recommend policy changes that support a strategic plan.
    • Assess the potential impact or influence of power on organizational policy.
  • Competency 5: Address assessment purpose in effective written or multimedia presentations, incorporating appropriate evidence and communicating in a form and style consistent with applicable professional and academic standards.
    • Articulate meaning relevant to the main topic, scope, and purpose of the prompt.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you feeling overwhelmed with writing your nursing research papers or assignments? Tackling nursing assignments often involves thorough research and the gathering of relevant information and evidence. If you find yourself struggling or lacking the necessary research skills, fret not! At NursingCustomWriting.com, we’re your reliable nursing writing service, here to ease your academic journey.

Why Choose Our Nursing Paper Writing Services?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, making them accessible to all college students. We understand the financial constraints students face and strive to provide quality assistance at a reasonable cost.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers perfect your paper, bringing in the expertise needed for exceptional results. Our team is composed of professionals who understand the intricacies of nursing assignments, ensuring your work stands out.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Bid farewell to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts are committed to crafting original and customized nursing essays, ensuring academic integrity and success.
  • Timely Support for Your Coursework: Worried about looming deadlines? We’ve mastered the art of helping nursing students with coursework, even with tight timelines. Trust us to save your academic life and ensure timely submissions.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert. We make the process seamless for your convenience.

How We Can Help You To Do Your Nursing Papers:

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our team at NursingCustomWriting.com stays updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust NursingCustomWriting.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Grades: Order Your Nursing Essays Today

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. At NursingCustomWriting.com, we always endeavor to provide you with the best quality and achieve high levels of customer satisfaction. Order now without hesitation, and let us help you shine in your academic journey!